CVE-2022-1817 in Badminton Center Management System
Summary
by MITRE • 05/23/2022
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Badminton Center Management System. This affects the userlist module at /bcms/admin/?page=user/list. The manipulation of the argument username with the input 1 leads to an authenticated cross site scripting. Exploit details have been disclosed to the public.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/29/2022
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2022-1817 represents a critical authenticated cross site scripting flaw within the Badminton Center Management System's userlist module. This security weakness resides at the specific endpoint /bcms/admin/?page=user/list where the application fails to properly sanitize user input parameters. The vulnerability manifests when an authenticated administrator or authorized user manipulates the username argument by providing the input value of 1, which triggers the execution of malicious javascript code within the context of the victim's browser session. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-79 which specifically addresses cross site scripting conditions where web applications fail to properly validate or escape user-supplied data before incorporating it into dynamically generated web pages.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft or session hijacking, as it allows attackers with valid administrative credentials to execute arbitrary javascript code within the browser of any user who views the compromised userlist page. This creates a persistent threat vector where malicious actors can establish backdoors, steal session cookies, perform unauthorized transactions, or redirect users to malicious websites. The authenticated nature of this vulnerability means that attackers must first obtain legitimate administrative credentials, but once achieved, they can leverage this flaw to maintain persistent access and expand their attack surface within the system. This weakness directly maps to attack techniques described in the MITRE ATT&CK framework under T1059.007 for command and scripting interpreter and T1566.001 for credential harvesting.
The exploitation of this vulnerability demonstrates a fundamental failure in input validation and output encoding practices within the application's userlist module. The system's inability to properly escape or validate the username parameter before rendering it in the web interface creates an environment where malicious javascript payloads can be executed without proper sanitization. Security practitioners should recognize this as a classic example of insufficient input validation where the application trust the integrity of user-supplied data without proper verification. The vulnerability's disclosure to the public community indicates that the threat landscape now includes potential adversaries who can leverage this flaw to compromise the system's integrity and confidentiality. Organizations utilizing this management system must urgently implement proper input validation mechanisms, implement proper output encoding for all user-supplied data, and conduct thorough code reviews to identify similar patterns throughout the application codebase.
Mitigation strategies should include immediate implementation of proper input sanitization techniques such as parameterized queries, output encoding, and strict validation of all user-supplied parameters. The system should enforce proper content security policies to prevent execution of unauthorized javascript code and implement proper access controls to limit administrative privileges to only necessary personnel. Additionally, organizations should consider implementing web application firewalls to detect and prevent exploitation attempts, conduct regular security assessments to identify similar vulnerabilities, and maintain up-to-date security patches for the application. The vulnerability underscores the importance of defensive programming practices and demonstrates how seemingly simple input validation failures can create significant security risks in administrative interfaces.