CVE-2022-28387 in Executive Fingerprint Secure SSD GDMSFE01-INI3637-C
Summary
by MITRE • 06/08/2022
An issue was discovered in certain Verbatim drives through 2022-03-31. Due to an insecure design, they can be unlocked by an attacker who can then gain unauthorized access to the stored data. The attacker can simply use an undocumented IOCTL command that retrieves the correct password. This affects Executive Fingerprint Secure SSD GDMSFE01-INI3637-C VER1.1 and Fingerprint Secure Portable Hard Drive Part Number #53650.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/11/2022
This vulnerability represents a critical security flaw in Verbatim's secure storage devices that fundamentally undermines their cryptographic protection mechanisms. The issue stems from an insecure design approach where the devices expose undocumented input/output control commands that allow unauthorized users to retrieve the encryption passwords directly from the system. This weakness affects specific models including the Executive Fingerprint Secure SSD GDMSFE01-INI3637-C VER1.1 and the Fingerprint Secure Portable Hard Drive Part Number #53650, both released prior to March 31, 2022. The vulnerability essentially creates a backdoor access mechanism that bypasses all intended authentication protocols and encryption safeguards.
The technical implementation of this flaw involves the exploitation of undocumented IOCTL (Input/Output Control) commands that are not properly secured or validated within the device's firmware architecture. These commands, when properly crafted and executed, can directly retrieve the encryption password from the device's memory without requiring legitimate authentication. This represents a fundamental failure in the principle of least privilege and proper access control implementation, as the device fails to adequately validate command sources or implement proper authentication checks. The vulnerability falls under CWE-254 which addresses security weaknesses related to inadequate access control mechanisms, and more specifically aligns with CWE-310 which deals with cryptographic issues including weak or improperly implemented encryption.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability creates a severe risk landscape for organizations and individuals using these storage devices. Attackers who can physically access or remotely exploit these devices gain immediate access to all encrypted data without requiring additional credentials or complex attack vectors. The impact extends beyond simple data theft to include potential corporate espionage, intellectual property theft, and compliance violations for organizations that rely on these devices for data protection. The vulnerability affects the core security promise of the devices, which is to provide secure storage through encryption and biometric authentication, rendering these protections meaningless when exploited. This weakness particularly impacts sectors such as healthcare, finance, and government where data protection is mandated by regulations like HIPAA, PCI DSS, and various national security frameworks.
The mitigation strategy for this vulnerability requires immediate action from affected users including firmware updates from Verbatim if available, or complete replacement of the affected devices. Organizations should conduct comprehensive inventories to identify all affected hardware and implement alternative secure storage solutions. Security teams should also review their incident response procedures to account for potential data breaches resulting from this vulnerability. The exploitation of such undocumented commands highlights the importance of proper security testing and code review processes during device development, particularly in embedded systems where firmware security is paramount. This vulnerability demonstrates the critical need for proper software design principles and adherence to security standards such as those outlined in the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, which emphasizes the importance of secure development practices and proper risk assessment methodologies.
The broader implications of this vulnerability extend to the entire secure storage industry, as it reveals potential gaps in how manufacturers approach security by design principles. The presence of undocumented commands in production firmware represents a failure in proper software lifecycle management and security auditing processes. This issue also aligns with ATT&CK technique T1552.001 which covers unsecured credentials and T1071.004 which addresses application layer protocols, as the exploitation involves improper handling of device communication protocols and credential management. Organizations should implement additional monitoring and detection capabilities to identify potential exploitation attempts, particularly in environments where these devices are deployed. The vulnerability serves as a reminder that even devices marketed as secure storage solutions can contain fundamental design flaws that compromise their entire security posture.