CVE-2022-30587 in Gradle Enterprise
Summary
by MITRE • 06/07/2022
Gradle Enterprise through 2022.2.2 has Incorrect Access Control that leads to information disclosure.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/10/2022
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2022-30587 affects Gradle Enterprise versions up to and including 2022.2.2, representing a critical access control flaw that permits unauthorized information disclosure. This issue stems from insufficient authorization checks within the platform's security architecture, allowing malicious actors to potentially access sensitive data that should be restricted to authorized users only. The vulnerability exists in the application's permission model and authentication mechanisms, creating a pathway for privilege escalation and data exposure.
Gradle Enterprise is a comprehensive platform designed to provide build automation and dependency management capabilities for software development teams. The platform serves as a central hub for managing build processes, storing artifacts, and tracking project dependencies across organizations. When a security flaw exists in such a critical infrastructure component, the implications extend far beyond individual applications to potentially compromise entire development pipelines and organizational data assets. The access control failure specifically manifests when the system fails to properly validate user permissions before granting access to sensitive information, including build logs, dependency details, project configurations, and other proprietary data that may contain intellectual property or security-sensitive information.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability involves the platform's failure to enforce proper authorization checks on various API endpoints and user interfaces. Attackers can exploit this weakness by crafting specific requests that bypass normal access controls, potentially gaining visibility into projects they should not have access to or retrieving information that would normally be restricted. The flaw likely resides in how the system validates session tokens, user roles, or permission levels when processing requests, creating opportunities for unauthorized data retrieval. This type of vulnerability aligns with CWE-285, which describes improper authorization within software systems, and represents a significant deviation from the principle of least privilege that should govern all enterprise software applications. The impact is particularly severe given that Gradle Enterprise is commonly used by organizations managing sensitive software development workflows and proprietary codebases.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability creates substantial risk for organizations relying on Gradle Enterprise for their build infrastructure. The information disclosure could expose sensitive build configurations, dependency trees, and project metadata that might reveal system architecture details to competitors or malicious actors. In environments where Gradle Enterprise manages multiple projects from different business units or clients, unauthorized access could result in cross-contamination of sensitive data or exposure of intellectual property. The vulnerability also potentially enables attackers to gather intelligence about development practices, build processes, and system configurations that could be leveraged for subsequent attacks. Organizations using this platform may face regulatory compliance issues if sensitive data is exposed, particularly in industries with strict data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, or government sectors.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2022-30587 should prioritize immediate patching of affected Gradle Enterprise installations to version 2022.2.3 or later, which contains the necessary security fixes. Organizations should conduct thorough security assessments of their Gradle Enterprise deployments to identify any potential exploitation that may have occurred prior to patching. Network segmentation and access controls should be implemented to limit exposure of the platform to only authorized personnel, while monitoring systems should be enhanced to detect anomalous access patterns that might indicate exploitation attempts. Security teams should review and strengthen authentication mechanisms, implement multi-factor authentication where possible, and conduct regular audits of user permissions to ensure proper access control enforcement. The remediation process should also include comprehensive testing to verify that the access control fixes have been properly implemented and that no regressions have been introduced. Organizations should also consider implementing additional security controls such as web application firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and regular security scanning to protect against similar vulnerabilities in their software development infrastructure.