CVE-2022-43787
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2023
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/05/2026
CVE records that remain unused or unutilized pose significant challenges to cybersecurity infrastructure and threat intelligence capabilities. When a vulnerability identifier is created but never actively referenced in security advisories, threat feeds, or incident response documentation, it creates gaps in the collective knowledge base that security professionals rely upon for effective defense operations. The practice of maintaining unused CVE records undermines the integrity of the CVE numbering system and can lead to confusion among security teams who may encounter orphaned identifiers during their investigations.
From a technical perspective, unused CVE records represent wasted resources within the cybersecurity ecosystem. Each CVE identifier requires maintenance, tracking, and validation by the CVE Numbering Authority, consuming valuable administrative overhead that could be allocated to actively monitored vulnerabilities. The lack of usage also means these identifiers do not contribute to threat intelligence databases, security information and event management systems, or vulnerability management workflows. This absence creates blind spots in defensive operations where organizations may fail to recognize potential threats associated with these unused identifiers.
The operational impact extends beyond simple resource waste to compromise the effectiveness of security monitoring and incident response procedures. Security operations centers often depend on comprehensive CVE databases to correlate threat indicators and identify system vulnerabilities. When unused records exist within these databases, they can create false negatives in vulnerability scanning tools or generate unnecessary alerts during security assessments. Additionally, these orphaned identifiers may confuse security analysts during threat hunting activities, particularly when conducting research into specific vulnerability families or attack patterns.
Industry standards such as the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) and MITRE ATT&CK framework emphasize the importance of maintaining accurate and complete vulnerability information for effective cybersecurity operations. The CWE standard specifically addresses the need for precise weakness descriptions and classification systems that support comprehensive threat modeling activities. Similarly, ATT&CK framework relies on accurate vulnerability data to map attack techniques and identify potential defensive measures. Unused CVE records create inconsistencies in these frameworks by introducing incomplete or obsolete information that may mislead analysts during threat analysis.
Organizations implementing vulnerability management programs must address unused CVE records through systematic review processes and database maintenance procedures. Effective mitigation strategies include establishing regular audits of CVE databases, implementing automated systems to flag unused identifiers, and maintaining clear policies for record retirement. The National Institute of Standards and Technology cybersecurity frameworks recommend periodic assessment of vulnerability data quality and completeness as part of comprehensive security management practices.
Security vendors and threat intelligence providers should implement validation processes that ensure only actively referenced CVE records are included in their databases, preventing the propagation of unused identifiers throughout the broader cybersecurity ecosystem. This approach aligns with best practices for maintaining data integrity and ensuring that security professionals work with accurate and relevant information. The proper handling of CVE records through active usage or appropriate retirement maintains the trustworthiness of vulnerability databases and supports effective threat intelligence operations across all security domains.