CVE-2022-43828
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2023
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/17/2026
The rejection of the assigned Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier indicates that the specific vulnerability instance did not meet the criteria for public disclosure or tracking within the official CVE List maintained by MITRE Corporation and its authorized Numbering Authorities. This administrative action is standard procedure when a reported issue lacks sufficient evidence, duplicates an existing record, or fails to demonstrate a tangible security impact on any supported software version. Consequently, there is no active vulnerability associated with this specific identifier in public threat intelligence feeds, meaning it should not be referenced as a valid security flaw by organizations relying on CVE data for risk assessment and patch management.
From a technical perspective, the absence of an active record implies that either the reported behavior was determined to be expected functionality rather than a defect, or the issue could not be reproduced under controlled conditions during validation. In some cases, vulnerabilities are rejected because they affect only deprecated versions of software no longer receiving security updates from vendors, thereby rendering them irrelevant for current compliance and operational environments. Security teams should verify whether similar issues have been assigned different CVE identifiers that remain active and tracked within the ecosystem.
For organizations managing their vulnerability landscapes, it is critical to distinguish between rejected or withdrawn CVE records and those currently listed as valid. Relying on invalid identifiers can lead to false positives in scanning tools or unnecessary remediation efforts for non-existent threats. Instead of focusing on this specific identifier, security operations centers should prioritize active vulnerabilities that have been validated by vendors and assigned official tracking numbers. Regular updates from trusted sources such as National Vulnerability Database (NVD) feeds and vendor-specific advisories remain the most reliable method for maintaining an accurate inventory of known exploitable flaws.
Compliance frameworks often require organizations to track and remediate specific CVEs, but these requirements typically apply only to vulnerabilities that are actively tracked and have available patches or mitigations. Since this record has been rejected, it does not constitute a compliance gap unless the underlying issue was addressed through alternative means documented in other security advisories. Auditors generally accept explanations for why certain reported issues were deemed non-vulnerabilities by authoritative bodies like CNAs. Therefore, no immediate action is required regarding this specific identifier, but continuous monitoring of legitimate CVE publications remains essential for maintaining a robust security posture and adhering to industry standards such as NIST SP 800-42 guidelines on information system security.