CVE-2023-1725 in Project Management System
Summary
by MITRE • 03/30/2023
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/22/2026
The CVE-2023-1725 vulnerability represents a critical server-side request forgery flaw within the Infoline Project Management System, a widely deployed enterprise project management solution. This vulnerability resides in the system's handling of external resource requests and allows malicious actors to manipulate the application's behavior by tricking it into making unintended requests to internal or external systems. The flaw specifically impacts versions prior to 4.09.31.125, indicating that organizations running older iterations of this software remain at significant risk. Server-side request forgery vulnerabilities typically arise when applications fail to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied input that is used to construct HTTP requests to external services. The vulnerability enables attackers to bypass access controls and potentially access internal resources that should otherwise be protected from external access, creating a pathway for information disclosure, internal network reconnaissance, and further exploitation.
The technical implementation of this SSRF vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of input parameters that are processed by the Infoline Project Management System when handling external resource references. Attackers can exploit this weakness by crafting malicious requests that force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, including internal network addresses, loopback interfaces, or other systems within the organization's network perimeter. This vulnerability aligns with CWE-918, which specifically addresses server-side request forgery, and demonstrates how inadequate input validation can lead to unauthorized access to internal systems. The attack vector typically involves manipulation of parameters that control external resource fetching, such as URLs or endpoints, where the application fails to properly verify that the requested resources are legitimate and authorized for access. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple information disclosure as it can enable attackers to perform reconnaissance on internal systems, access sensitive data, or even escalate privileges within the network environment.
The operational impact of CVE-2023-1725 within enterprise environments can be severe and multifaceted, particularly in organizations that rely heavily on the Infoline Project Management System for business-critical operations. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to internal network resources, potentially compromising sensitive project data, user credentials, or system configurations. The vulnerability creates a persistent threat vector that could be leveraged for lateral movement within the network, as attackers might use the compromised system as a pivot point to target other internal systems. Organizations running vulnerable versions of the software face risks of data breaches, regulatory compliance violations, and potential financial losses due to operational disruptions. The vulnerability's stealth nature makes it particularly dangerous as it may go undetected for extended periods, allowing attackers to maintain persistent access while conducting reconnaissance and data exfiltration activities. From a threat modeling perspective, this vulnerability maps to several ATT&CK techniques including T1071.004 for application layer protocol and T1566 for phishing, as attackers might use this vulnerability to gain initial access or expand their foothold within the network.
Organizations should prioritize immediate remediation by upgrading to version 4.09.31.125 or later, which includes patches addressing the SSRF vulnerability. System administrators should implement network segmentation and access controls to limit the potential impact of exploitation, particularly by restricting outbound connections from the project management system to internal network resources. Additional defensive measures include implementing web application firewalls to monitor and filter suspicious requests, conducting regular security assessments of the application's input handling mechanisms, and establishing network monitoring to detect unusual outbound traffic patterns. Security teams should also review and test the application's configuration to ensure that external resource access is properly restricted and validated. The vulnerability highlights the importance of maintaining up-to-date software versions and implementing robust input validation controls. Organizations should consider implementing principle of least privilege access controls for the project management system and establish monitoring procedures to detect potential exploitation attempts. Regular security training for developers and administrators on secure coding practices can help prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced in future releases, emphasizing the need for comprehensive security testing including vulnerability scanning and penetration testing of web applications.