CVE-2023-30898 in Siveillance Video 2020
Summary
by MITRE • 05/09/2023
A vulnerability has been identified in Siveillance Video 2020 R2 (All versions < V20.2 HotfixRev14), Siveillance Video 2020 R3 (All versions < V20.3 HotfixRev12), Siveillance Video 2021 R1 (All versions < V21.1 HotfixRev12), Siveillance Video 2021 R2 (All versions < V21.2 HotfixRev8), Siveillance Video 2022 R1 (All versions < V22.1 HotfixRev7), Siveillance Video 2022 R2 (All versions < V22.2 HotfixRev5), Siveillance Video 2022 R3 (All versions < V22.3 HotfixRev2), Siveillance Video 2023 R1 (All versions < V23.1 HotfixRev1). The Event Server component of affected applications deserializes data without sufficient validations. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute code on the affected system.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/01/2023
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2023-30898 represents a critical deserialization flaw within the Event Server component of multiple Siveillance Video software versions. This issue affects a broad range of products spanning from 2020 through 2023 release cycles, with specific hotfix requirements varying by version. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation during data deserialization processes, creating a pathway for malicious actors to exploit the system remotely. The flaw specifically impacts systems where the Event Server component handles incoming data streams, making it particularly dangerous in surveillance environments where continuous data processing occurs. This type of vulnerability is classified under CWE-502 as "Deserialization of Untrusted Data," which directly aligns with the core technical issue present in these video management systems.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple code execution capabilities, as it enables authenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized control over affected systems. Attackers can leverage this flaw to inject malicious code that executes with the privileges of the Event Server process, potentially leading to complete system compromise. The authentication requirement means that attackers must first establish valid credentials, but once obtained, they can leverage this vulnerability to escalate their access and potentially move laterally within the network. The Event Server component typically processes security events, alarm notifications, and system alerts, making it a prime target for attackers seeking to manipulate surveillance data or establish persistent access points. This vulnerability directly maps to ATT&CK technique T1059.007 for Command and Scripting Interpreter and T1566.001 for Phishing, as the attacker can execute commands through the deserialization process while potentially using legitimate credentials to avoid detection.
Organizations utilizing affected Siveillance Video systems face significant operational risks including potential data breaches, system compromise, and disruption of surveillance operations. The vulnerability's remote execution capability means that attackers can exploit it from outside the network perimeter, making traditional network security controls less effective against this specific threat. The affected versions span multiple years of product releases, indicating this flaw has persisted across several iterations, suggesting potential design flaws in the data handling architecture rather than isolated incidents. Security teams must prioritize patching these systems immediately, as the vulnerability can be exploited without requiring special privileges beyond legitimate user access. The remediation process requires careful consideration of system downtime and potential compatibility issues with existing surveillance workflows. Organizations should implement network segmentation to limit access to Event Server components, deploy intrusion detection systems to monitor for unusual deserialization patterns, and conduct thorough security assessments of all connected systems. Additionally, regular security audits should verify that proper input validation controls are in place to prevent similar vulnerabilities in other components of the video management infrastructure.