CVE-2023-38465 in SC9832E
Summary
by MITRE • 09/04/2023
In ims service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/30/2023
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2023-38465 resides within the ims service component, representing a critical permission validation flaw that undermines the security posture of the affected system. This issue manifests as a missing permission check mechanism that allows unauthorized local access to sensitive information. The vulnerability specifically impacts systems where the ims service operates with elevated privileges or access to confidential data streams, creating an avenue for information disclosure without requiring additional malicious execution capabilities. The absence of proper authorization controls within the service architecture means that any local entity with access to the ims service interface can potentially extract confidential data that should be restricted to authorized users or processes.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from inadequate access control enforcement within the ims service framework, where the system fails to verify whether requesting entities possess the necessary permissions before granting access to information resources. This flaw typically occurs when the service component does not properly validate user credentials, roles, or access levels before processing information requests. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-284 which specifically addresses improper access control issues in software systems, where insufficient permission checks result in unauthorized data exposure. The missing permission validation creates a direct pathway for privilege escalation or information leakage scenarios where local attackers can exploit this weakness to obtain sensitive data that would normally be protected by proper authorization mechanisms.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability presents a significant risk to system integrity and data confidentiality, particularly in environments where the ims service handles sensitive communication data or user information. The impact extends beyond simple information disclosure as it can enable further exploitation attempts by providing attackers with valuable reconnaissance data that might reveal system configurations, user patterns, or communication protocols. Attackers leveraging this vulnerability can gain insights into system architecture, data flows, and potentially identify additional attack vectors within the broader network infrastructure. The lack of additional execution privileges required for exploitation means that even minimal local access can result in substantial information compromise, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous in multi-tenant or shared computing environments where isolation between users is critical.
Security mitigation strategies for CVE-2023-38465 should prioritize immediate implementation of proper permission validation controls within the ims service framework. Organizations must ensure that all access requests to the ims service undergo comprehensive authorization checks before any information is returned or processed. This includes implementing role-based access control mechanisms, mandatory access controls, and proper authentication verification procedures. The fix should align with established security frameworks such as the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ISO 27001 standards, which emphasize the importance of access control and information protection. Additionally, regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar permission validation gaps across other service components. System administrators should also implement monitoring solutions to detect unauthorized access attempts and establish incident response procedures specifically designed to address information disclosure events. The remediation process must include thorough code reviews, security testing, and validation of permission enforcement mechanisms to prevent similar vulnerabilities from emerging in future system updates or modifications.