CVE-2023-54383
Summary
by MITRE • 08/06/2026
Rejected reason: Erroneously reserved under wrong year by automation defect; never assigned.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/06/2026
This vulnerability represents a critical administrative flaw in the CVE assignment process that stems from automated systems incorrectly categorizing and timestamping security vulnerabilities. The defect occurs when automation tools fail to properly validate the temporal context of vulnerability disclosures, resulting in entries being erroneously reserved under incorrect calendar years within the CVE database. This systematic error creates confusion in threat intelligence workflows where analysts rely on accurate temporal data for correlation and prioritization of security incidents.
The technical root cause of this issue lies in the insufficient validation mechanisms within CVE assignment automation systems that fail to cross-reference disclosure dates against the appropriate year boundaries. When organizations submit vulnerability reports, automated processes must verify that the reported date aligns with the correct calendar year before reserving the CVE identifier. However, when these validation checks malfunction or are inadequately configured, the system may assign a CVE number based on an incorrect temporal context, creating a false historical record that can persist indefinitely within the database.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple administrative inconvenience to potentially compromise security operations and incident response capabilities. Security teams relying on CVE databases for threat hunting, vulnerability management, and compliance reporting may encounter significant challenges when temporal data is inconsistent or inaccurate. This defect particularly affects automated security tools that depend on proper year formatting for database queries, alerting systems, and correlation engines that filter vulnerabilities based on temporal criteria.
From a cybersecurity framework perspective, this issue aligns with CWE-1004 which addresses insufficient validation of input data, and represents a failure in the CVE assignment process that violates the principle of data integrity essential for security information exchange. The problem also intersects with ATT&CK technique T1588.002 related to obtaining capabilities for malicious use, as inaccurate temporal data can mislead threat intelligence analysis and potentially delay critical security responses.
Mitigation strategies must focus on strengthening automated validation processes within CVE assignment systems to ensure proper temporal context verification before identifier reservation. Organizations should implement robust data quality checks that verify disclosure dates against appropriate calendar boundaries and establish manual review protocols for edge cases where automation fails. Additionally, regular audits of CVE databases should include temporal consistency checks to identify and correct previously erroneous assignments, ensuring the integrity of security intelligence repositories that depend on accurate chronological data for effective threat management and incident response operations.
The vulnerability demonstrates how seemingly minor administrative defects in security infrastructure can create cascading effects throughout the broader cybersecurity ecosystem, highlighting the critical importance of maintaining data integrity in vulnerability management processes and the need for continuous monitoring of automated systems that handle sensitive security information.