CVE-2024-1224 in USB Pratirodh
Summary
by MITRE • 03/06/2024
This vulnerability exists in USB Pratirodh due to the usage of a weaker cryptographic algorithm (hash) SHA1 in user login component. A local attacker with administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability to obtain the password of USB Pratirodh on the targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to take control of the application and modify the access control of registered users or devices on the targeted system.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/15/2026
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-1224 resides within the USB Pratirodh application, a security tool designed to protect USB devices through authentication mechanisms. This weakness specifically manifests in the user login component where the system employs the outdated SHA1 cryptographic hash algorithm instead of more secure alternatives. The use of SHA1 represents a significant security flaw as this algorithm has been widely deprecated due to its susceptibility to collision attacks and cryptographic weaknesses that have been documented since 2005. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-327, which addresses the use of weak cryptographic algorithms, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1552.001 for credentials from password storage.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability requires a local attacker who already possesses administrative privileges on the target system, which significantly reduces the attack surface but still presents a critical risk. Attackers can leverage the SHA1 implementation to reverse-engineer or brute-force user credentials, effectively compromising the authentication mechanism. The weakness in the hash algorithm creates a pathway for attackers to obtain valid user passwords, which then enables full control over the application's functionality. This particular vulnerability demonstrates poor security hygiene in cryptographic implementation where industry standards such as NIST SP 800-131A explicitly recommend against using SHA1 for password hashing and authentication purposes. The cryptographic weakness directly impacts the integrity and confidentiality of the authentication process, making it trivial for attackers to bypass access controls.
The operational impact of successfully exploiting CVE-2024-1224 extends beyond simple credential theft to full system compromise. Once an attacker obtains user credentials through the weakened SHA1 implementation, they can modify access controls for registered users or devices within the USB Pratirodh application. This capability allows for privilege escalation and persistent access to the system, potentially enabling attackers to establish backdoors or maintain long-term control over the protected USB environment. The vulnerability creates a persistent threat vector that can be leveraged to compromise the entire USB security infrastructure managed by the application. Organizations relying on this tool for USB device protection face significant risk of unauthorized access to sensitive data and systems, particularly in environments where USB devices serve as primary data transfer mechanisms.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-1224 must address the immediate cryptographic weakness while implementing broader security improvements. The primary recommendation involves upgrading the authentication system to utilize stronger cryptographic algorithms such as SHA-256 or SHA-3 for password hashing, following NIST guidelines for secure cryptographic practices. System administrators should also implement additional security controls including multi-factor authentication, regular security audits of cryptographic implementations, and comprehensive monitoring for unauthorized access attempts. The vulnerability highlights the importance of adhering to security best practices and regularly updating cryptographic implementations to prevent exploitation. Organizations should conduct thorough vulnerability assessments of their security tools and ensure that all cryptographic implementations meet current industry standards and regulatory requirements. Additionally, implementing proper access controls and privilege management can limit the impact of potential exploitation even when cryptographic weaknesses exist.