CVE-2024-22011 in Android
Summary
by MITRE • 03/11/2024
In ss_ProcessRejectComponent of ss_MmConManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/18/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-22011 resides within the ss_ProcessRejectComponent function of the ss_MmConManagement.c source file, representing a critical out-of-bounds read condition that fundamentally compromises system integrity. This flaw manifests as a missing bounds check during memory access operations, creating an exploitable pathway where malicious actors can traverse memory boundaries without proper validation. The vulnerability is particularly concerning because it enables remote information disclosure attacks that require no additional execution privileges beyond the initial network access, making it highly accessible to threat actors regardless of their technical sophistication level. The absence of user interaction requirements for exploitation further amplifies the risk, as attackers can initiate the attack vector autonomously without relying on social engineering or user engagement tactics.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation within the memory management component of the affected system, specifically during the processing of reject component operations. When the ss_ProcessRejectComponent function handles incoming data structures, it fails to verify that memory access operations remain within allocated boundaries, allowing for potential buffer overread conditions. This particular flaw aligns with CWE-129, which categorizes improper bounds checking as a fundamental weakness in memory safety mechanisms, and represents a direct violation of secure coding practices established by industry standards. The vulnerability operates at the memory management layer, where legitimate system operations can be subverted through carefully crafted input sequences that trigger the missing bounds validation.
The operational impact of CVE-2024-22011 extends beyond simple information disclosure, as it creates opportunities for attackers to extract sensitive data from system memory locations that should remain protected. This information disclosure capability can potentially expose system configurations, user credentials, communication protocols, or other confidential data that resides in adjacent memory regions. The remote exploitation nature of this vulnerability means that attackers can leverage network-based attack vectors to access the system from external locations, eliminating the need for physical presence or local network access. From an adversary perspective, this vulnerability maps directly to ATT&CK technique T1005, which focuses on data from local system storage, and T1041, which addresses data encryption for impact, as the disclosed information could facilitate further attacks or compromise additional system components.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-22011 must address the root cause through comprehensive code review and implementation of proper bounds checking mechanisms within the affected memory management functions. System administrators should prioritize immediate patch deployment if available, as the vulnerability's remote exploitability and lack of user interaction requirements create an urgent security risk. Additionally, implementing network-based intrusion detection systems can help identify exploitation attempts by monitoring for unusual traffic patterns that may indicate exploitation of this vulnerability. The fix should incorporate defensive programming practices including bounds validation, memory access sanitization, and comprehensive input parameter checking to prevent similar issues from occurring in other system components. Regular security assessments and code audits should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities within the broader codebase, ensuring adherence to secure development lifecycle principles and reducing the attack surface for future exploits.