CVE-2024-23403
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2025
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/30/2026
CVE records must demonstrate actual usage and impact to maintain compliance with CNA guidelines and industry standards. This policy ensures that only vulnerabilities with verified exploitation or significant security implications receive official CVE identification. The rejection process helps prevent proliferation of虚假 or unverified vulnerability entries in the CVE database, which could otherwise lead to confusion among security professionals and organizations attempting to prioritize their remediation efforts.
The validation requirements for CVE assignment typically include evidence of the vulnerability being exploited in the wild, documented proof of concept demonstrations, or substantial security research that establishes clear risk assessment. CNA organizations enforce these rules to maintain the integrity and reliability of the CVE system as a global standard for vulnerability identification. Without demonstrable usage or impact, a vulnerability cannot be properly categorized within established threat models or security frameworks.
This approach aligns with cybersecurity best practices outlined in standards such as those referenced in CWE categories that require verified exploitation scenarios before classifying vulnerabilities. The ATT&CK framework also emphasizes the importance of validated attack patterns and real-world exploitation when assessing threat capabilities. Organizations rely on these established records to make informed decisions about risk management, patch prioritization, and security controls implementation.
The rejection process serves as a quality control mechanism within the broader cybersecurity ecosystem, ensuring that CVE entries maintain their credibility and utility for security teams worldwide. When vulnerabilities lack evidence of actual usage or exploitation, they do not meet the threshold for official recognition under CNA policies. This maintains the distinction between theoretical risks and proven threats that require immediate attention from security practitioners.
Security researchers and vendors must demonstrate concrete evidence of vulnerability exploitation through public reports, proof-of-concept code, or credible threat intelligence before receiving official CVE assignment. The CNA framework prioritizes resources toward vulnerabilities that present actual risk to organizations rather than theoretical possibilities. This approach helps streamline security operations by focusing attention on verified threats that require immediate remediation efforts.
The policy also reflects industry consensus around maintaining the relevance and accuracy of vulnerability databases. Unverified entries can create confusion during incident response activities, potentially leading to misallocation of security resources or false sense of security when dealing with actual threats. By requiring demonstrated usage, CNAs ensure that their CVE records remain valuable tools for threat intelligence sharing and security coordination across global cybersecurity communities.