CVE-2024-27228 in Android
Summary
by MITRE • 03/11/2024
In TBD of TBD, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/28/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-27228 represents a critical heap buffer overflow condition that exists within the targeted software component. This flaw manifests as an out of bounds write operation, where malicious data can be written beyond the allocated memory boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer. The vulnerability's presence in the target software creates a potential pathway for adversaries to execute arbitrary code remotely without requiring any additional privileges or user interaction to initiate exploitation. The absence of user interaction requirements significantly amplifies the threat surface, as attackers can leverage this vulnerability through automated means without needing to trick users into performing specific actions. This type of vulnerability typically arises from insufficient bounds checking mechanisms within memory management functions, particularly when handling user-supplied data or network inputs that are processed through heap-based memory allocation routines.
The technical implementation of this heap buffer overflow stems from improper validation of input data sizes before writing operations to heap-allocated memory regions. When the software processes data that exceeds the expected buffer dimensions, the write operation extends beyond the allocated memory space, potentially overwriting adjacent memory locations including metadata, function pointers, or other critical program structures. This condition creates opportunities for attackers to manipulate program execution flow through techniques such as return-oriented programming or function pointer overwrites. The vulnerability's classification aligns with CWE-121, which describes heap-based buffer overflow conditions, and represents a direct threat to memory safety mechanisms within the software architecture. The lack of user interaction requirements means that exploitation can occur through network-based attacks without requiring social engineering or user deception tactics, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where remote access is possible.
The operational impact of CVE-2024-27228 extends beyond simple remote code execution capabilities to encompass potential system compromise and persistent access. Once successfully exploited, attackers can gain full control over the affected system, potentially establishing backdoors, exfiltrating sensitive data, or using the compromised system as a launch point for further attacks within the network. The vulnerability's characteristics place it within the ATT&CK framework's technique T1059 for command and scripting interpreter, where adversaries can leverage the remote code execution capability to establish persistent access through various persistence mechanisms. The absence of privilege escalation requirements means that even low-privilege network access can lead to full system compromise, making this vulnerability particularly attractive to threat actors. Organizations running affected software versions face significant risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, and potential lateral movement within their network infrastructure.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-27228 should prioritize immediate patch deployment from the software vendor, as this represents a critical vulnerability requiring urgent attention. Network segmentation and access controls should be implemented to limit potential attack vectors, while monitoring systems should be enhanced to detect anomalous network traffic patterns that might indicate exploitation attempts. Security teams should implement memory safety monitoring tools and runtime protections to detect buffer overflow conditions before they can be exploited. The vulnerability's nature suggests that traditional input validation measures may be insufficient, requiring more comprehensive memory integrity checks and heap management monitoring. Organizations should also consider implementing intrusion detection systems that can identify potential exploitation attempts through signature-based detection of malicious payloads designed to trigger heap buffer overflows. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities within the software ecosystem, ensuring that memory safety mechanisms are robust against similar attack vectors.