CVE-2024-31374 in AppPresser Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 04/15/2024
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Bolinger AppPresser apppresser allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AppPresser: from n/a through <= 4.3.0.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/02/2026
The Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-31374 resides within the Scott Bolinger AppPresser apppresser application, representing a critical security flaw that undermines the integrity of web applications. This vulnerability stems from inadequate validation of requests originating from external domains, creating an exploitable condition where malicious actors can manipulate user sessions and execute unauthorized actions. The affected version range spans from the initial release through version 4.3.0, indicating a prolonged period during which applications utilizing this plugin remained susceptible to such attacks.
The technical implementation of this CSRF flaw involves the absence of proper anti-forgery tokens or validation mechanisms that should ensure requests originate from legitimate sources within the same application context. When a user interacts with a compromised AppPresser application, attackers can craft malicious web pages or emails that, when visited by authenticated users, automatically submit requests to the vulnerable application without user consent. This vulnerability directly maps to CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in web applications, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001 for initial access through spearphishing attachments. The flaw operates by exploiting the trust relationship between the web application and its users, bypassing standard authentication mechanisms through the manipulation of HTTP requests.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft or modification, as it can enable complete account compromise and unauthorized administrative actions within the affected WordPress environment. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to modify user permissions, inject malicious content, or even completely takeover user accounts, particularly when the targeted users possess elevated privileges. The exploitation process typically involves social engineering tactics where users are tricked into visiting malicious websites that contain embedded CSRF payloads, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where users frequently access untrusted web content. This threat vector represents a significant concern for mobile application developers who rely on AppPresser for their WordPress-based mobile solutions, as it compromises the security of applications that may handle sensitive user data or business-critical information.
Mitigation strategies for this CSRF vulnerability must encompass both immediate remediation efforts and long-term security enhancements. Organizations should prioritize updating to the latest available version of AppPresser where the vulnerability has been patched, as version 4.3.1 or subsequent releases should contain the necessary security fixes. Additionally, implementing proper CSRF token validation mechanisms, enforcing strict referer header checks, and utilizing SameSite cookies can significantly reduce the attack surface. Security measures should also include regular vulnerability assessments, monitoring for suspicious user activities, and educating end-users about the dangers of visiting untrusted websites. Organizations utilizing AppPresser should conduct comprehensive security audits to ensure no other applications or plugins within their WordPress environment share similar vulnerabilities. The implementation of web application firewalls and content security policies can provide additional layers of protection, while adherence to secure coding practices such as those outlined in OWASP Top Ten and NIST cybersecurity guidelines will help prevent similar issues in future development cycles. This vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of maintaining up-to-date security practices and the necessity of implementing robust anti-forgery measures in all web applications that process user requests.