CVE-2024-31384 in Spa and Salon Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 04/15/2024
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Spa and Salon.This issue affects Spa and Salon: from n/a through 1.2.7.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 01/09/2026
The CVE-2024-31384 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw within the Rara Theme Spa and Salon WordPress plugin, posing significant security risks to affected websites. This vulnerability allows authenticated attackers with contributor-level privileges or higher to manipulate the plugin's functionality through crafted requests, potentially leading to unauthorized actions on behalf of users. The affected version range spans from unspecified earlier versions through 1.2.7, indicating that any installation within this scope remains vulnerable to exploitation.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-forgery token validation within the plugin's administrative endpoints. When users with appropriate permissions access the plugin's settings or perform administrative actions, the system fails to verify that requests originate from legitimate sources within the same session. This design flaw enables attackers to construct malicious requests that can be executed without user knowledge or consent, particularly when victims are logged into their WordPress admin panels. The vulnerability operates at the application layer, specifically targeting the plugin's user interface and administrative functions that handle configuration changes and user management operations.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation, potentially enabling attackers to perform actions such as modifying salon booking configurations, altering service offerings, changing pricing structures, or even compromising user data within the plugin's scope. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disrupt business operations, manipulate revenue streams, or gain unauthorized access to sensitive customer information stored within the salon management system. The attack vector requires minimal privileges, making it particularly dangerous as it can be exploited by users who have contributor access or higher, which is common in many WordPress installations where multiple users manage content and settings.
Organizations affected by this vulnerability should prioritize immediate remediation through plugin updates to version 1.2.8 or later, which contains the necessary patches to address the CSRF implementation flaw. Security teams should also implement additional monitoring of administrative activities and user sessions to detect anomalous behavior that might indicate exploitation attempts. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses cross-site request forgery conditions in web applications, and maps to ATT&CK technique T1078.004 for valid accounts, as the attack requires legitimate user credentials to be effective. Network administrators should consider implementing web application firewalls to detect and block suspicious requests targeting the vulnerable plugin endpoints, while also conducting thorough security audits of all installed WordPress plugins to identify similar vulnerabilities that might exist in other third-party components.
This vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of proper input validation and session management in web applications, particularly those handling sensitive business data. The Rara Theme Spa and Salon plugin's failure to implement adequate CSRF protection mechanisms highlights a common oversight in plugin development where security considerations are not fully integrated into the application's core functionality. Organizations should establish comprehensive security testing protocols that include vulnerability assessments of all third-party components, particularly those with administrative capabilities or access to sensitive data. Regular security updates and patch management procedures become essential defensive measures, as this vulnerability could have been prevented through proper security review processes during the plugin's development lifecycle, emphasizing the need for robust security controls throughout the software development life cycle to prevent similar issues in future implementations.