CVE-2024-31425 in Amelia Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 04/15/2024
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMS Amelia.This issue affects Amelia: from n/a through 1.0.95.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/06/2025
The Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-31425 resides within the TMS Amelia platform, representing a critical security flaw that undermines the application's ability to authenticate legitimate user requests. This vulnerability specifically impacts versions of Amelia ranging from an unspecified initial version through 1.0.95, creating a window of exposure for attackers to exploit. The flaw stems from insufficient validation mechanisms that fail to verify the origin of HTTP requests, allowing malicious actors to trick authenticated users into executing unintended actions. The vulnerability manifests when users navigate to compromised web pages or click on malicious links while maintaining an active session with the Amelia application, thereby enabling unauthorized operations to be performed on their behalf. This type of vulnerability directly violates the fundamental principle of web application security by failing to implement proper anti-CSRF measures that would normally include unique tokens or referer validation.
The technical implementation of this CSRF flaw in TMS Amelia demonstrates a failure in the application's request validation process, where the system does not adequately verify that incoming requests originate from legitimate sources within the same domain. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that contain embedded requests to the Amelia application, leveraging the victim's existing authenticated session to perform actions such as modifying user settings, accessing restricted data, or executing administrative functions without the user's knowledge or consent. This vulnerability operates at the HTTP protocol level, exploiting the stateless nature of web communications where session cookies are automatically included with every request, making it particularly dangerous for applications that rely heavily on user authentication. The flaw represents a classic example of CWE-352, which defines Cross-Site Request Forgery as a vulnerability where an attacker tricks a victim into performing actions they did not intend to execute.
The operational impact of CVE-2024-31425 extends beyond simple data exposure, potentially enabling attackers to compromise entire user accounts and gain unauthorized access to sensitive information within the Amelia platform. Organizations utilizing this software may face significant security breaches where unauthorized modifications occur to user profiles, data integrity is compromised, or administrative privileges are abused. The vulnerability's exploitation can lead to cascading effects throughout the application ecosystem, particularly if the affected system handles sensitive user data or performs critical administrative functions. Security teams must recognize that CSRF attacks often serve as initial entry points for more sophisticated breaches, where attackers establish persistence and escalate privileges within the compromised environment. This vulnerability also aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566, which covers social engineering tactics that manipulate users into performing actions that compromise their systems, specifically targeting the user interaction component of the attack chain.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-31425 must include immediate implementation of anti-CSRF tokens that are generated per user session and validated with each request, ensuring that requests originate from legitimate sources within the application. Organizations should implement proper referer header validation, utilize the SameSite cookie attributes, and enforce strict origin validation mechanisms to prevent cross-domain request forgery. The most effective approach involves deploying unique, unpredictable tokens that are tied to specific user sessions and validated on the server side before processing any critical operations. Additionally, implementing Content Security Policy headers and ensuring proper session management practices can significantly reduce the attack surface. Organizations must also conduct comprehensive security assessments to identify other potential CSRF vulnerabilities within their application stack and ensure that all user-facing endpoints are properly protected. Regular security updates and patch management processes should be prioritized to address this vulnerability before it can be exploited by malicious actors in the wild, as the timeframe between vulnerability disclosure and exploitation often represents a critical window for organizations to secure their systems.