CVE-2024-32449 in RestroPress Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 04/15/2024
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MagniGenie RestroPress.This issue affects RestroPress: from n/a through 3.1.2.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/06/2025
The Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-32449 resides within the MagniGenie RestroPress plugin, representing a critical security flaw that undermines the integrity of web applications. This vulnerability specifically impacts versions of RestroPress ranging from the initial release through version 3.1.2, creating a persistent threat vector that affects numerous users of the WordPress restaurant management plugin. The flaw allows malicious actors to exploit the application's trust relationship with authenticated users, potentially enabling unauthorized actions to be executed on behalf of legitimate users without their knowledge or consent.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-CSRF token validation within the plugin's request processing mechanisms. When users access the RestroPress admin interface or perform specific actions through the web application, the system fails to adequately verify the authenticity of requests originating from authorized sources. This weakness manifests as a failure to implement cryptographic token validation, a fundamental security control that should be present in all web applications handling user requests. The vulnerability directly maps to CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery conditions and represents one of the most prevalent web application security flaws in the industry. Without proper validation of request origins, attackers can craft malicious requests that appear to originate from legitimate authenticated users, thereby bypassing the application's authorization controls.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation to encompass potential complete system compromise and unauthorized administrative access. Attackers exploiting this flaw could perform critical administrative functions such as modifying restaurant configurations, altering menu items, updating pricing structures, or even deleting important operational data. The consequences are particularly severe for restaurant management systems where unauthorized modifications could lead to financial losses, service disruptions, or reputational damage. Furthermore, the vulnerability could enable attackers to establish persistent access points within the application, potentially allowing them to exfiltrate sensitive customer data or use the compromised system as a launching point for broader attacks against the organization's network infrastructure. This threat is amplified by the fact that RestroPress serves as a restaurant management solution, making it a valuable target for cybercriminals seeking to exploit hospitality industry systems.
Security mitigation strategies for this CSRF vulnerability must address both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements to prevent similar issues. The most effective immediate solution involves implementing robust anti-CSRF token mechanisms that generate unique, cryptographically secure tokens for each user session and validate these tokens on every state-changing request. This approach aligns with the ATT&CK framework's defense in depth principles and specifically addresses the T1548.003 technique related to abuse of credentials. Organizations should also implement proper request origin validation, ensure that all administrative functions require explicit user confirmation, and deploy comprehensive logging mechanisms to detect suspicious activities. Additionally, regular security audits and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities across the entire application stack, as the presence of one CSRF vulnerability often indicates potential weaknesses in the overall security architecture. The recommended remediation process includes updating to the latest version of RestroPress where the vulnerability has been patched, implementing additional security layers such as Content Security Policy headers, and establishing automated monitoring systems to detect unauthorized access attempts.