CVE-2024-33332 in SpringBlade
Summary
by MITRE • 04/30/2024
An issue discovered in SpringBlade 3.7.1 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via crafted GET request to api/blade-system/tenant.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/14/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-3332 resides within SpringBlade version 3.7.1, a Java-based application framework that provides enterprise-level functionality for building web applications. This security flaw manifests as an information disclosure vulnerability that can be exploited through a specifically crafted GET request targeting the api/blade-system/tenant endpoint. The affected system processes this particular API endpoint without adequate authorization controls or input validation, creating a pathway for malicious actors to extract sensitive data from the underlying system. The vulnerability represents a critical weakness in the application's access control mechanisms and data protection architecture.
The technical implementation of this flaw stems from insufficient validation of user requests and lack of proper authentication checks within the tenant management API. When a malicious user submits a crafted GET request to the api/blade-system/tenant endpoint, the system fails to verify whether the requester possesses legitimate authorization to access the requested tenant information. This oversight allows unauthorized parties to bypass normal access controls and retrieve sensitive data such as tenant configurations, user credentials, system metadata, or other confidential information that should remain protected. The vulnerability falls under CWE-284, which specifically addresses inadequate access control mechanisms, and demonstrates poor privilege management within the application's security model. The flaw essentially creates a backdoor through which attackers can harvest system information without proper credentials or authorization.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple information disclosure, potentially enabling more sophisticated attacks within the compromised environment. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability could gain insights into the organization's tenant structure, system architecture, and potentially identify other vulnerable components within the same application ecosystem. This reconnaissance capability allows adversaries to plan more targeted attacks against the system, potentially leading to privilege escalation, data breaches, or further exploitation of interconnected services. The vulnerability directly aligns with ATT&CK technique T1213.002, which involves data from information repositories, and can contribute to broader attack chains involving credential access and lateral movement. Organizations using SpringBlade 3.7.1 may face significant security risks, including compliance violations, regulatory penalties, and potential financial losses from data exposure.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-3332 should focus on immediate implementation of proper access controls and input validation mechanisms. Organizations must ensure that all API endpoints, particularly those handling sensitive tenant information, require proper authentication and authorization before returning any data. The recommended approach includes implementing robust role-based access control, adding request validation checks, and enforcing strict input sanitization for all API calls. System administrators should also consider implementing rate limiting and monitoring for suspicious API access patterns to detect potential exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should upgrade to patched versions of SpringBlade if available, and conduct comprehensive security audits of all API endpoints to identify similar vulnerabilities. The fix should address the core issue of insufficient access control by ensuring that all requests to the api/blade-system/tenant endpoint require valid authentication tokens and appropriate user permissions before returning any sensitive information. Regular security testing and penetration testing should be conducted to validate the effectiveness of implemented controls and identify any remaining security gaps in the application's access control framework.