CVE-2024-38729 in MBE eShip Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 01/02/2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MBE Worldwide S.p.A. MBE eShip allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects MBE eShip: from n/a through 2.1.2.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/16/2025
This cross-site request forgery vulnerability in MBE eShip represents a critical security flaw that undermines the application's ability to authenticate legitimate user requests. The vulnerability exists within the web application's request processing mechanism, where the system fails to properly validate the origin of incoming requests, allowing attackers to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. The affected version range spans from an unspecified initial version through 2.1.2, indicating this weakness has persisted across multiple releases and represents a long-standing security oversight in the application's architecture.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-forgery tokens or origin validation mechanisms within the application's request handling flow. When users interact with the MBE eShip application, their sessions are typically authenticated through cookies or tokens, but the application does not adequately verify that requests originate from legitimate sources within the same origin. This allows attackers to craft malicious requests that leverage the user's existing authenticated session to perform actions such as modifying shipment details, creating new shipments, or accessing sensitive data without the user's knowledge or consent. The flaw operates at the application layer where HTTP requests are processed, making it particularly dangerous as it can be exploited through social engineering techniques or by luring users to visit malicious websites that trigger unauthorized operations.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data exposure to encompass potential financial losses, operational disruptions, and compliance violations. Attackers could manipulate shipment records, alter delivery addresses, or create fraudulent shipments that could result in significant monetary losses for both the organization and its customers. The vulnerability also poses risks to business continuity as unauthorized modifications to shipment data could disrupt logistics operations and damage customer relationships. From a compliance perspective, this vulnerability may violate various regulatory requirements including those related to data integrity and access control, potentially exposing the organization to legal consequences and reputational damage. The attack surface is particularly concerning given that the application handles sensitive logistics and shipping information that could be valuable to cybercriminals.
Organizations should implement multiple layers of defense to mitigate this CSRF vulnerability effectively. The primary remediation involves implementing robust anti-forgery token mechanisms that are generated for each user session and validated on every state-changing request. These tokens should be cryptographically secure and tied to specific user sessions to prevent attackers from reusing them across different contexts. Additionally, implementing proper origin validation checks and using the SameSite cookie attributes can provide additional protection against cross-site request forgery attacks. The application should also enforce strict input validation and implement proper session management practices to ensure that user sessions cannot be hijacked or reused. Organizations should conduct comprehensive security testing including penetration testing and code reviews to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities across their entire application portfolio. This vulnerability aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery, and represents a common pattern that appears in many web applications where proper security controls are not adequately implemented at the request processing level. The ATT&CK framework categorizes this as a privilege escalation technique under the T1548.001 sub-technique, where attackers leverage existing authenticated sessions to perform unauthorized actions within the target application.