CVE-2024-45804
Summary
by MITRE • 09/17/2024
Rejected reason: This CVE is a duplicate of another CVE.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/08/2026
This vulnerability represents a duplicate entry that has been formally rejected by the CVE Numbering Authority. The rejection occurs when multiple CVE identifiers are assigned to what is essentially the same security flaw, typically due to overlapping reporting timelines or identical technical descriptions across different organizations. Such duplications create confusion in vulnerability management systems and can lead to inconsistent patching strategies across enterprise environments. The duplicate identification process follows established CVE management protocols where the authoritative body evaluates submissions and determines that two or more identifiers reference the same underlying security issue, resulting in one identifier being retired while the other remains active.
The technical nature of such duplicates often involves vulnerabilities where different organizations independently discover and report the same flaw without knowledge of each other's findings. This scenario commonly occurs with widely known attack vectors such as buffer overflows, injection flaws, or authentication bypasses that security researchers may identify through different methodologies or reporting channels. The duplicate CVE situation creates challenges in vulnerability correlation systems where security tools and databases must properly handle the relationship between the retired identifier and the active one. When an organization's vulnerability management system encounters a duplicate CVE, it must correctly map the historical data to ensure proper tracking of remediation efforts and prevent redundant alerting or patching activities.
From a cybersecurity operations perspective, duplicate CVE entries can significantly impact incident response procedures and security posture assessments. Security teams relying on automated systems for vulnerability scanning and assessment may encounter inconsistencies when processing reports that reference multiple identifiers for the same vulnerability. The presence of duplicate entries in security databases affects threat intelligence platforms and security information event management systems that depend on accurate CVE mappings for correlation analysis. Organizations implementing security controls based on CVE data must account for these duplicates to maintain effective risk mitigation strategies, particularly when integrating with third-party vulnerability management solutions or compliance frameworks that reference specific CVE identifiers.
The resolution of duplicate CVE situations typically follows established protocols within the CVE numbering authority's governance structure, ensuring that only one authoritative identifier remains active for each unique vulnerability. Security professionals should verify that their vulnerability databases are properly synchronized with official CVE listings to avoid confusion during security assessments and incident response activities. The proper handling of duplicate CVEs reflects broader cybersecurity governance principles where accurate identification and consistent referencing of vulnerabilities form the foundation for effective threat management and security operations. Organizations must maintain awareness of CVE status changes and ensure their internal processes account for potential identifier consolidations that may occur as part of ongoing vulnerability management practices.
Industry standards such as those defined by the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) and the MITRE ATT&CK framework provide supporting context for understanding how duplicate vulnerabilities impact security operations. The CWE database helps categorize the underlying weakness patterns that lead to such duplication scenarios, while ATT&CK mappings demonstrate how these vulnerabilities might manifest in operational environments. When a CVE is rejected as a duplicate, security teams must ensure their systems properly handle the transition from the retired identifier to the active one, maintaining accurate correlation of threat intelligence and remediation tracking. Proper management of duplicate CVE situations ensures that security operations maintain consistent references to vulnerability data while preserving historical context for forensic analysis and compliance reporting purposes.