CVE-2024-47622 in Advanced Woo Labels Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 10/05/2024
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in ILLID Advanced Woo Labels advanced-woo-labels allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced Woo Labels: from n/a through <= 2.01.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/05/2026
This vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw in the ILLID Advanced Woo Labels plugin for WordPress, specifically impacting versions through 2.01. The vulnerability stems from improper input sanitization during web page generation processes, creating an environment where malicious scripts can be persistently stored and executed within the target system. The flaw enables attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code through user input fields that are then stored in the database and subsequently rendered in web pages without proper sanitization or encoding mechanisms. This stored XSS vulnerability allows threat actors to execute malicious scripts in the context of any user who views the affected pages, potentially leading to session hijacking, data theft, or further exploitation of the compromised system. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it leverages the plugin's functionality to generate web pages, where user-supplied data is not adequately neutralized before being rendered back to users.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability aligns with CWE-79, which specifically addresses cross-site scripting flaws in web applications. This weakness occurs when application developers fail to properly sanitize or encode user input before incorporating it into web page content, creating opportunities for attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the victim's browser context. The vulnerability operates through the plugin's web page generation mechanisms where stored data is retrieved and displayed without appropriate input validation or output encoding. Attackers can exploit this by crafting malicious payloads in input fields that are then stored in the database and executed whenever users access pages containing this data. The attack vector specifically targets the plugin's handling of user-generated content during the page rendering process, where input data flows directly into HTML output without proper security measures.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script execution, as it provides attackers with persistent access to compromised systems through the stored malicious content. When users view pages containing the stored XSS payload, their browsers execute the injected scripts in the context of the vulnerable application, potentially allowing attackers to access sensitive session cookies, modify page content, redirect users to malicious sites, or harvest user credentials. The vulnerability affects the entire user base of the affected plugin, as any user who views pages containing the stored malicious content becomes a potential victim of the attack. This creates a widespread risk across all users of the vulnerable plugin, particularly those with administrative privileges who may be targeted for privilege escalation attacks. The persistent nature of stored XSS means that the malicious code remains active until the stored content is removed from the database, making it particularly challenging to detect and remediate.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on immediate patching of the affected plugin to version 2.02 or later, which contains the necessary security fixes. Organizations should implement comprehensive input validation and output encoding mechanisms to prevent similar vulnerabilities in other applications, following the principle of least privilege and proper data sanitization. Security measures should include regular vulnerability assessments of all installed plugins and themes, implementing web application firewalls to detect and block malicious payloads, and establishing robust monitoring procedures to identify unauthorized modifications to stored data. The remediation process should also involve thorough review of all user input handling within the application, ensuring that all data flows through proper sanitization and encoding mechanisms before being rendered in web pages. Additionally, organizations should consider implementing content security policies and regular security audits to prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced in future development cycles, while also maintaining detailed logging of user activities to detect potential exploitation attempts.