CVE-2024-51785 in Responsive Filterable Portfolio Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 11/09/2024
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in I Thirteen Web Solution Responsive Filterable Portfolio allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Responsive Filterable Portfolio: from n/a through 1.0.22.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/09/2024
The Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-51785 resides within the I Thirteen Web Solution Responsive Filterable Portfolio plugin, presenting a critical security risk that allows attackers to manipulate server-side requests through improperly validated input parameters. This vulnerability specifically impacts versions ranging from an unspecified starting point through version 1.0.22, creating a window of exposure for systems running affected software implementations. The flaw enables malicious actors to leverage the plugin's functionality to make unauthorized requests to internal or external systems, potentially bypassing network security controls and accessing sensitive resources that should otherwise remain protected. Such vulnerabilities typically arise when applications fail to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied data that is subsequently used in server-side operations, creating pathways for attackers to exploit the application's trust in its own processing capabilities.
The technical nature of this SSRF vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation mechanisms within the plugin's request handling processes, particularly in how it processes filter parameters or portfolio data inputs. When users interact with the responsive portfolio functionality, the application may accept crafted input that directs server requests to unintended destinations, including internal network resources, loopback addresses, or other systems that should be inaccessible to external users. This flaw operates at the application layer and can be exploited through various means including direct parameter manipulation, URL encoding techniques, or by leveraging the plugin's legitimate functionality to redirect requests to attacker-controlled endpoints. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-918, which specifically addresses Server-Side Request Forgery in the context of web applications, where attackers can manipulate the target of server-side requests through unvalidated input. The attack vector typically involves sending malicious requests to the vulnerable plugin endpoint, causing the server to make unintended connections to internal services or external systems that the attacker can monitor or control.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data exposure, potentially enabling attackers to perform reconnaissance activities against internal network infrastructure, access sensitive server information, or even facilitate further attacks through the exploitation of other vulnerabilities discovered during the reconnaissance phase. Organizations running affected versions of the Responsive Filterable Portfolio plugin face significant risk of unauthorized access to internal systems, including potential compromise of backend databases, internal APIs, or other critical infrastructure components that may be reachable through the server's network connections. The vulnerability can also serve as a stepping stone for more sophisticated attacks, allowing threat actors to establish persistent access or escalate privileges within the compromised environment. This type of vulnerability commonly maps to ATT&CK technique T1566.002, which covers Server-Side Request Forgery, where adversaries leverage applications to make requests to internal resources that would otherwise be inaccessible from external networks.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-51785 should prioritize immediate remediation through the application of available security patches or updates from the vendor, as this represents a critical vulnerability requiring urgent attention. System administrators should implement network-level restrictions to prevent outbound connections from web servers to internal network resources, particularly blocking connections to loopback addresses, private IP ranges, and other sensitive internal endpoints. Input validation controls must be strengthened to ensure all user-supplied parameters are properly sanitized and validated before being processed by the server-side components. Organizations should also consider implementing web application firewalls that can detect and block suspicious request patterns associated with SSRF attacks. Additionally, security monitoring should be enhanced to detect unusual outbound network connections from web servers that may indicate exploitation attempts. The vulnerability highlights the importance of proper security controls in web applications and demonstrates how seemingly benign functionality can become a vector for significant security compromise when input validation is insufficient. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities across the entire application stack, ensuring comprehensive protection against server-side request forgery and related attack vectors.