CVE-2024-5676 in IP150 Internet Module
Summary
by MITRE • 06/19/2024
The Paradox IP150 Internet Module in version 1.40.00 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks due to a lack of countermeasures and the use of the HTTP method `GET` to introduce changes in the system.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 03/22/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-5676 affects the Paradox IP150 Internet Module version 1.40.00 and represents a critical Cross-Site Request Forgery flaw that undermines the security posture of the device. This vulnerability stems from the module's improper handling of state-changing operations through HTTP GET requests, which violates fundamental web security principles and creates significant attack surface for malicious actors. The use of GET methods for operations that modify system state fundamentally compromises the integrity of the application's security model since GET requests are designed for data retrieval rather than data modification.
The technical flaw manifests in the module's failure to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-forgery tokens or origin validation checks. This absence of defensive measures means that an attacker can craft malicious web pages or links that, when visited by an authenticated user, will automatically execute unintended operations on the IP150 module. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it leverages the trust relationship between the user's browser and the device, allowing attackers to perform actions such as changing system configurations, modifying user accounts, or accessing restricted functionalities without proper authorization. The implementation of CSRF protection mechanisms is a core requirement defined by CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities in web applications.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data modification, potentially enabling attackers to gain unauthorized access to the device's administrative functions and compromise the entire security infrastructure of the module. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to modify network settings, change access credentials, or disable security features, effectively taking control of the device. The implications are particularly severe in security-sensitive environments where the IP150 module serves as a gateway or control point for critical systems. This vulnerability directly aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001, which covers the use of malicious web content to perform unauthorized actions on targeted systems.
Organizations utilizing the Paradox IP150 Internet Module should immediately implement mitigations including the deployment of proper CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations, the enforcement of POST methods for configuration changes, and the implementation of strict origin validation checks. Network segmentation and access control measures should be strengthened to limit potential attack vectors, while administrators should monitor for unauthorized configuration changes and implement comprehensive logging of all administrative activities. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of proper input validation and the need for security testing during the development lifecycle to prevent similar issues in future releases. This flaw represents a clear violation of secure coding practices and emphasizes the critical need for security awareness in embedded system development, particularly when dealing with internet-facing modules that require robust authentication and authorization mechanisms.