CVE-2024-57610 in Sylius
Summary
by MITRE • 02/06/2025
A rate limiting issue in Sylius v2.0.2 allows a remote attacker to perform unrestricted brute-force attacks on user accounts, significantly increasing the risk of account compromise and denial of service for legitimate users.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/29/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-57610 represents a critical security flaw in Sylius version 2.0.2 that fundamentally undermines the platform's authentication security mechanisms. This issue stems from inadequate rate limiting controls that fail to properly restrict the number of authentication attempts a remote attacker can make against user accounts. The absence of effective rate limiting creates an environment where malicious actors can systematically exploit the system through automated brute-force attacks without encountering meaningful barriers. This vulnerability directly impacts the integrity and availability of user accounts within the Sylius e-commerce platform, potentially allowing unauthorized access to sensitive customer data and financial information.
The technical implementation flaw manifests as a failure in the authentication subsystem to enforce proper throttling mechanisms. When users attempt to log in with invalid credentials, the system should implement progressive rate limiting that increases delays or blocks further attempts after a predetermined threshold. However, in Sylius v2.0.2, this protective mechanism is either completely absent or insufficiently configured, allowing attackers to rapidly iterate through username and password combinations at an unrestricted pace. This behavior aligns with CWE-307, which addresses improper restriction of repeated activities, and represents a classic example of insufficient account lockout or rate limiting controls. The vulnerability essentially provides attackers with a pathway to conduct prolonged brute-force campaigns that would normally be blocked by proper security controls.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple account compromise to include significant denial of service implications for legitimate users. When attackers conduct brute-force attacks against multiple user accounts, they consume system resources and create artificial load that can degrade service availability for genuine customers. Legitimate users attempting to access their accounts may experience delays or temporary blocking due to the system's inability to distinguish between legitimate and malicious authentication attempts. This creates a cascading effect where the platform's availability is compromised, potentially leading to revenue loss and customer dissatisfaction. The vulnerability also increases the risk of credential stuffing attacks, where attackers can leverage previously compromised credentials from other platforms to target Sylius users, amplifying the potential damage.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2024-57610 should focus on implementing robust rate limiting mechanisms that align with established security best practices. Organizations should deploy adaptive rate limiting that dynamically adjusts restrictions based on authentication patterns and geographic origins of login attempts. The implementation should include progressive delay mechanisms that increase authentication attempt delays after multiple failed attempts, as well as account lockout procedures that temporarily prevent access after reaching predetermined failure thresholds. Security controls should also incorporate behavioral analytics to detect and block suspicious authentication patterns that deviate from normal user behavior. From an ATT&CK framework perspective, this vulnerability maps to techniques involving credential access and denial of service, specifically T1110 for Brute Force and T1499 for Endpoint Denial of Service. Organizations should also consider implementing multi-factor authentication as an additional security layer that can mitigate the impact of compromised credentials even when brute-force attacks succeed. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to validate the effectiveness of implemented rate limiting controls and ensure continued protection against similar vulnerabilities.