CVE-2024-6463
Summary
by MITRE • 07/04/2024
Rejected reason: **REJECT** This is a duplicate CVE issued in error on a framework vulnerability. Please use CVE-2024-5324 instead.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/25/2026
The subject identifier represents a redundant entry within the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures database, resulting from an administrative duplication rather than a distinct technical flaw. This specific record was issued in error as it mirrors the characteristics of an existing vulnerability cataloged under CVE-2024-5324. Consequently, this duplicate does not introduce any new attack vectors or unique exploitation paths that are not already documented and tracked by its parent identifier. Security practitioners and automated scanning tools should disregard this entry to avoid confusion in reporting metrics and patch management workflows.
The underlying technical context pertains to a vulnerability within the specified software framework, which is comprehensively detailed under CVE-2024-5324. This original flaw typically involves improper input validation or insecure default configurations that allow for unauthorized access or data exposure depending on the specific nature of the parent CVE. By referencing the primary identifier, organizations can align their remediation efforts with established advisories and patches released by the vendor. Maintaining a single authoritative record ensures consistency in threat intelligence feeds and reduces noise in security information and event management systems.
Operational impact is neutralized for this duplicate entry as it carries no independent risk profile separate from CVE-2024-5324. Attempting to remediate based on the redundant identifier may lead to misallocation of resources or confusion regarding patch applicability. It is critical that vulnerability scanners and configuration management databases are updated to suppress or ignore such duplicates, ensuring that only actionable intelligence drives security operations. This practice aligns with industry best practices for data hygiene in cybersecurity information sharing standards like STIX and TAXII.
Mitigation strategies should focus exclusively on the remediation steps outlined for CVE-2024-5324. Administrators must apply the vendor-recommended patches or configuration changes associated with that specific identifier to address the root cause of the framework vulnerability. Regular audits of internal vulnerability databases can help identify and archive such duplicates, maintaining a clean and accurate inventory of security issues. This approach supports compliance with frameworks like NIST SP 800-40 which emphasize effective vulnerability management processes through precise tracking and resolution of identified weaknesses.