CVE-2025-22300 in Your Smart Pixel Manager Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 01/07/2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PixelYourSite PixelYourSite – Your smart PIXEL (TAG) Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PixelYourSite – Your smart PIXEL (TAG) Manager: from n/a through 10.0.1.2.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/15/2025
The Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-22300 represents a critical security flaw in the PixelYourSite WordPress plugin, specifically within the PixelYourSite – Your smart PIXEL (TAG) Manager component. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the lack of proper authentication mechanisms to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. The affected version range spans from an unspecified starting point through version 10.0.1.2, indicating that all versions within this spectrum are potentially vulnerable to this attack vector. The vulnerability stems from inadequate CSRF protection measures that fail to validate the origin of requests submitted to the plugin's administrative interfaces. This flaw enables malicious actors to trick authenticated users into performing unintended operations such as modifying plugin settings, adding new tracking pixels, or altering existing configurations without their knowledge or consent.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability occurs when the plugin fails to implement proper anti-CSRF tokens or origin validation mechanisms in its administrative forms and API endpoints. Attackers can craft malicious requests that appear to originate from legitimate users within the WordPress admin environment, bypassing the standard authentication checks. The vulnerability manifests when users visit malicious websites or click on compromised links while logged into their WordPress admin panel, causing the browser to automatically submit requests to the vulnerable plugin's endpoints. This type of attack leverages the trust relationship between the user's browser and the WordPress installation, exploiting the fact that cookies are automatically included with every request to the domain. The flaw directly correlates to CWE-352, which defines Cross-Site Request Forgery as a weakness that allows attackers to perform actions on behalf of authenticated users without their knowledge.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation, potentially enabling attackers to compromise the entire WordPress installation through the plugin's administrative interface. An attacker who successfully exploits this CSRF vulnerability could modify tracking pixel configurations, inject malicious code into the website's tracking infrastructure, or even disable critical tracking functionality that could affect business analytics and advertising performance. The implications are particularly severe for businesses that rely heavily on pixel tracking for conversion monitoring, retargeting campaigns, and customer behavior analysis. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged to establish persistent backdoors or to perform actions that might go unnoticed for extended periods, making it a significant threat to website security and data integrity. The attack surface is further expanded because the plugin's functionality typically involves integration with various advertising platforms and analytics services, potentially allowing attackers to compromise these external systems through the compromised WordPress installation.
Mitigation strategies for this CSRF vulnerability should prioritize immediate plugin updates to versions that address the identified flaw, as the vendor has likely released patches to resolve the issue. Organizations should implement additional defensive measures such as enabling two-factor authentication for WordPress administrative accounts, restricting administrative access to trusted IP addresses, and monitoring for unusual administrative activities within the WordPress installation. The implementation of Content Security Policy headers and proper CSRF token validation mechanisms should be enforced at the application level to prevent unauthorized requests from being processed successfully. Network-level protections including web application firewalls and intrusion detection systems can help identify and block suspicious patterns of requests that may indicate CSRF attack attempts. Security teams should also conduct thorough audits of all installed plugins to identify similar vulnerabilities and establish regular security assessment procedures to detect and remediate such issues before they can be exploited by malicious actors. This vulnerability demonstrates the importance of maintaining up-to-date security practices and the critical need for proper input validation and authentication mechanisms in web applications.