CVE-2025-23892 in Progress Tracker Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 01/16/2025
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Alex Furr and Simon Ward Progress Tracker allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects Progress Tracker: from n/a through 0.9.3.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/10/2025
This vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw that specifically targets the web application's input handling mechanisms within the Progress Tracker system. The issue manifests as a DOM-based XSS vulnerability, which means that malicious script code can be injected directly into the Document Object Model of a web page without proper sanitization or validation of user-supplied data. This particular vulnerability affects versions of the Progress Tracker application ranging from the initial release through version 0.9.3, indicating a long-standing security weakness that has persisted across multiple iterations of the software. The flaw occurs during the web page generation process where input data is not properly neutralized before being rendered in the browser environment.
The technical nature of this vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation and sanitization routines that fail to properly escape or encode user-provided content before it is processed and displayed within the application's user interface. When users interact with the Progress Tracker application and provide input through various forms or parameters, the system does not adequately filter or sanitize this data to prevent malicious script execution. This allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes within the context of other users' browsers, potentially compromising their sessions and accessing sensitive information. The DOM-based nature of the vulnerability means that the malicious code is executed directly within the browser's document object model rather than being processed server-side, making it particularly challenging to detect and prevent through traditional server-side input validation methods.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft or session hijacking, as it creates a persistent security risk for all users of the affected Progress Tracker application. Attackers could exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the browsers of other users, potentially leading to complete account compromise, data exfiltration, or the redirection of users to malicious websites. The vulnerability affects the core functionality of the application by undermining the trust and integrity of the user interface, as any data displayed within the application could potentially contain malicious code. This creates a significant risk for organizations relying on the Progress Tracker for project management or progress monitoring, as unauthorized parties could manipulate the application's output to gain unauthorized access to sensitive project information or user data. The vulnerability's persistence across multiple versions suggests that the development team has not adequately addressed input sanitization concerns in their codebase, leaving users exposed to potential exploitation.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing robust input validation and output encoding mechanisms throughout the application's codebase. The most effective approach involves implementing proper Content Security Policy headers to limit script execution and ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly escaped before being rendered in the browser. Additionally, developers should implement strict input validation routines that reject or sanitize any potentially malicious content before it is processed by the application. The implementation of the OWASP Top Ten prevention techniques, particularly those related to input validation and output encoding, should be prioritized. Organizations should also consider implementing web application firewalls to detect and block suspicious input patterns, while regular security assessments should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities within the application's architecture. This vulnerability aligns with CWE-79 which specifically addresses cross-site scripting flaws, and represents a clear violation of the ATT&CK technique T1059.007 for script-based execution within web applications, highlighting the need for comprehensive security controls to protect against such persistent threats in web-based environments.