CVE-2025-24712 in Radius Blocks Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 01/24/2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RadiusTheme Radius Blocks allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Radius Blocks: from n/a through 2.1.2.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/08/2025
The Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-24712 resides within the RadiusTheme Radius Blocks WordPress plugin, representing a critical security flaw that undermines the integrity of web applications. This vulnerability specifically targets the plugin's handling of user requests, creating a pathway for malicious actors to exploit the trust relationship between authenticated users and the web application. The affected version range spans from an unspecified starting point through version 2.1.2, indicating that all installations within this scope remain vulnerable to exploitation. The vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-CSRF mechanisms, which are essential for validating the authenticity of user-initiated requests.
The technical implementation of this CSRF flaw allows attackers to manipulate authenticated user sessions without their knowledge or consent. When a user visits a malicious website or clicks on a crafted link, the vulnerability enables the execution of unauthorized actions on the target website where the user is authenticated. This typically occurs because the Radius Blocks plugin fails to implement robust token validation or referer header checks that would normally prevent such unauthorized operations. The vulnerability manifests when legitimate administrative functions are triggered through GET or POST requests that do not require additional authentication tokens, making it particularly dangerous for privileged users. According to CWE-352, this represents a classic Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability where the application lacks proper protection against unauthorized requests.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation to encompass potential complete system compromise. An attacker could leverage this weakness to perform administrative actions such as modifying plugin settings, adding new users, or even executing arbitrary code within the WordPress environment. The severity escalates when considering that the Radius Blocks plugin is likely used in conjunction with other security-sensitive applications, potentially creating cascading effects throughout the web application ecosystem. The vulnerability's exploitation requires minimal technical knowledge, making it particularly dangerous as it can be weaponized by threat actors with limited expertise. From an ATT&CK framework perspective, this vulnerability maps to T1566.001 (Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment) and T1071.001 (Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols) as attackers can craft malicious payloads that exploit the CSRF flaw through web-based attack vectors.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability must address both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements. The most critical step involves updating the Radius Blocks plugin to a version that contains proper CSRF protection mechanisms, typically implemented through unique tokens generated for each user session. Administrators should also implement additional security layers such as Content Security Policy headers and strict referer validation to further reduce the attack surface. Regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes remain essential, particularly focusing on authentication mechanisms and request validation processes. Organizations should also consider implementing web application firewalls that can detect and block suspicious cross-site request patterns. The vulnerability underscores the importance of maintaining up-to-date software and the necessity of thorough security testing during the development lifecycle. As per industry best practices, implementing proper input validation, session management, and authentication controls would prevent such vulnerabilities from manifesting in the first place, aligning with the principles outlined in OWASP Top Ten and NIST cybersecurity frameworks.