CVE-2025-30765 in FlexStock Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 03/27/2025
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in WPPOOL FlexStock allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects FlexStock: from n/a through 3.13.1.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 03/27/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-30765 represents a critical SQL injection flaw within the WPPOOL FlexStock plugin, specifically targeting versions ranging from an unspecified initial release through 3.13.1. This weakness falls under the well-documented category of improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, which constitutes a fundamental security flaw that enables attackers to manipulate database queries through malicious input. The vulnerability manifests as a blind SQL injection vector, meaning that attackers can infer database structure and content through indirect responses rather than direct data exposure. This type of injection occurs when user input is inadequately sanitized or escaped before being incorporated into SQL query constructions, allowing malicious actors to execute unauthorized database operations. The affected WPPOOL FlexStock plugin operates within WordPress environments, making it susceptible to exploitation by attackers who can manipulate various input fields that interact with the database.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from the plugin's failure to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied data before incorporating it into SQL queries. When legitimate users provide input through various interface elements or API endpoints, the plugin processes this data without adequate validation or escaping mechanisms, creating opportunities for attackers to inject malicious SQL code. In a blind SQL injection scenario, the attacker cannot directly observe the results of their injection attempts, but can still extract information through techniques such as time-based delays or conditional responses that indicate successful query execution. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple data theft, as it can enable full database compromise, allowing attackers to modify, delete, or exfiltrate sensitive information stored within the application's database. This weakness directly maps to CWE-89, which specifically addresses SQL injection vulnerabilities, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1071.004 for application layer protocol manipulation.
The operational impact of this vulnerability presents significant risks to organizations utilizing WPPOOL FlexStock, particularly those managing sensitive data through WordPress platforms. Attackers can leverage this blind SQL injection to gain unauthorized access to database contents, potentially compromising user credentials, product information, inventory data, or other confidential business information. The exploitation process typically involves crafting malicious payloads that can manipulate database queries to extract information through indirect means, such as observing response times or analyzing error conditions. Organizations running affected versions of the plugin face potential data breaches, regulatory compliance violations, and reputational damage. The vulnerability's presence in multiple versions indicates a persistent flaw in the plugin's input handling mechanisms, requiring immediate attention from system administrators and security teams. The attack surface expands when considering that WordPress installations often contain sensitive user data, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where database integrity and confidentiality are paramount.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2025-30765 must prioritize immediate remediation through version updates to the latest available release of WPPOOL FlexStock, as vendors typically address such vulnerabilities through patches and security updates. Organizations should implement comprehensive input validation and sanitization measures across all user-facing interfaces, ensuring that all database interactions utilize parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent malicious input from being interpreted as SQL commands. Network segmentation and database access controls should be strengthened to limit potential damage from successful exploitation attempts, while implementing web application firewalls can provide additional layers of protection against known attack patterns. Regular security audits and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities within the broader application ecosystem, as SQL injection flaws often indicate broader input validation weaknesses that require systematic remediation. System administrators should also monitor for suspicious database activities and implement logging mechanisms that can detect anomalous query patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. The implementation of principle of least privilege access controls for database accounts and regular security training for development teams can further reduce the risk of similar vulnerabilities occurring in the future, aligning with industry best practices for secure software development lifecycle implementation.