CVE-2025-46773 in FortiAnalyzer
Summary
by MITRE • 10/13/2026
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.11 may allow a low privileged user to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/13/2026
The identified vulnerability represents a critical security flaw within the Fortinet FortiAnalyzer suite and its cloud-based counterparts across multiple version branches, specifically affecting versions 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, all releases of 7.2, as well as corresponding Cloud editions. This issue is classified under the Common Weakness Enumeration identifier CWE-89, which denotes Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, commonly known as SQL Injection. The core technical flaw lies in the application's failure to adequately sanitize or validate user-supplied input before incorporating it into dynamically constructed database queries. When a low privileged user submits crafted requests containing maliciously formatted data structures, the backend system processes these inputs without sufficient filtering mechanisms, allowing special characters and command sequences to be interpreted as executable SQL code rather than literal data values.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability is particularly severe because of its accessibility by authenticated users with lower privilege levels. Typically, security architectures assume that low-privileged accounts pose a limited threat surface; however, in this instance, the lack of proper input validation allows these users to bypass standard access controls and interact directly with the underlying database engine. By injecting specific SQL commands, an attacker can manipulate query logic, potentially leading to unauthorized data retrieval, modification, or deletion within the FortiAnalyzer's extensive logs and configuration databases. The ability to execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests suggests that if the database service is configured with elevated system privileges or if there are further vulnerabilities in the application layer bridging SQL execution to operating system functions, the impact could escalate from data compromise to full remote code execution on the host server.
The presence of this vulnerability significantly undermines the integrity and confidentiality assurances provided by FortiAnalyzer, which serves as a central repository for security event logs and forensic data across enterprise networks. An attacker exploiting this flaw could exfiltrate sensitive log data containing network topology details, user credentials, or proprietary information stored within the appliance. Furthermore, depending on the specific database management system in use and its configuration, such injection attacks might allow for blind SQL injection techniques that enable time-based or error-based extraction of data without immediate feedback to the attacker. This capability facilitates persistent reconnaissance activities where an adversary can map out internal network structures and identify additional targets within the protected environment, aligning with ATT&CK technique T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter if command execution is achieved through database extensions like xp_cmdshell in Microsoft SQL Server environments or similar functions in other DBMS platforms.
To mitigate this risk, organizations utilizing affected versions of FortiAnalyzer must prioritize immediate patching to the latest stable release where these input validation mechanisms have been corrected by Fortinet engineering teams. Until patches are applied, network segmentation strategies should be enforced to restrict access to the management interfaces from untrusted networks or low-trust user groups. Additionally, implementing strict web application firewall rules that detect and block common SQL injection patterns can provide a temporary layer of defense against exploitation attempts. Security operations centers should also monitor for anomalous database query activity originating from lower-privileged accounts as an indicator of potential compromise. Long-term remediation involves adopting secure coding practices during software development lifecycle phases, ensuring that parameterized queries or prepared statements are utilized exclusively to separate code logic from data input, thereby neutralizing the vector exploited by this CWE-89 vulnerability.