CVE-2025-47446 in Listamester Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 05/07/2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in listamester Listamester allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Listamester: from n/a through 2.3.6.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/07/2025
This cross-site request forgery vulnerability in listamester represents a critical security flaw that enables attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users within the application. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient validation of request origins and lack of proper anti-CSRF token implementation in the application's web interface. The affected version range from n/a through 2.3.6 indicates that this flaw has persisted across multiple releases, suggesting a fundamental architectural weakness in the application's security controls.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the application's failure to enforce strict origin validation and missing anti-CSRF tokens in state-changing requests. When a user visits a malicious website or clicks on a crafted link while authenticated to listamester, the attacker can forge requests that appear legitimate to the application server. This occurs because the application does not properly verify that requests originate from the same site or require unique tokens to validate user intent. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in web applications. Attackers can exploit this flaw to perform actions such as modifying user accounts, deleting lists, or creating unauthorized entries within the listamester application.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data manipulation to potentially compromise user privacy and application integrity. An attacker could leverage this CSRF flaw to gain unauthorized access to user data, modify list configurations, or even escalate privileges within the application. The persistent nature of this vulnerability across multiple versions suggests that the application's security architecture has not been properly reviewed or updated to address fundamental web security principles. This flaw exposes users to potential data breaches and unauthorized modifications that could affect the entire list management system. Organizations using affected versions of listamester face significant risk of unauthorized access and potential data compromise, particularly in environments where users may encounter malicious websites or phishing attempts.
Mitigation strategies for this CSRF vulnerability should focus on implementing robust anti-CSRF token mechanisms throughout the application's web interface. The recommended approach includes generating unique, cryptographically secure tokens for each user session and validating these tokens on all state-changing requests. Additionally, implementing strict origin validation and utilizing the SameSite cookie attributes can provide additional layers of protection. Organizations should immediately upgrade to patched versions of listamester and conduct thorough security reviews of their web applications. The implementation of Content Security Policy headers and proper input validation can further reduce the attack surface. Security teams should also consider implementing web application firewalls to monitor and block suspicious requests that attempt to exploit CSRF vulnerabilities. This remediation aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566, which addresses social engineering through web-based attacks, and emphasizes the importance of proper authentication and authorization controls in preventing unauthorized access to web applications.