CVE-2025-47752 in V-SFT
Summary
by MITRE • 05/19/2025
V-SFT v6.2.5.0 and earlier contains an issue with out-of-bounds write in VS6ComFile!MakeItemGlidZahyou function. Opening specially crafted V7 or V8 files may lead to crash, information disclosure, and arbitrary code execution.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/19/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-47752 affects V-SFT version 6.2.5.0 and earlier, representing a critical out-of-bounds write flaw within the VS6ComFile!MakeItemGlidZahyou function. This issue manifests when the software processes specially crafted V7 or V8 file formats, creating a significant attack surface that can be exploited by malicious actors. The vulnerability resides in the file parsing mechanism where insufficient input validation leads to memory corruption during the processing of structured data within these proprietary file formats. The affected software ecosystem operates under the assumption that input files adhere to expected formats, but the lack of proper bounds checking allows attackers to craft malicious files that trigger memory corruption patterns.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from improper array boundary validation within the MakeItemGlidZahyou function, which operates on coordinate data structures typical of mapping or geographic information systems. When parsing V7 or V8 files, the software reads coordinate values without adequate verification of array dimensions or buffer sizes, leading to writes occurring beyond allocated memory boundaries. This flaw directly corresponds to CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write, a well-documented weakness that frequently appears in software handling structured binary data. The vulnerability can be triggered through simple file manipulation, requiring no user interaction beyond opening the malicious file, making it particularly dangerous in automated exploitation scenarios. The out-of-bounds write creates unpredictable memory corruption that can manifest as program crashes, data corruption, or more severe exploitation outcomes.
The operational impact of CVE-2025-47752 extends beyond simple application instability to encompass potential system compromise and data exposure. When exploited successfully, the vulnerability can lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing attackers to gain full control over the affected system. The crash conditions may result in denial-of-service scenarios, while information disclosure capabilities could expose sensitive data from memory segments. Attackers leveraging this vulnerability can potentially execute malicious code with the privileges of the affected application, creating persistent backdoors or escalating privileges to system-level access. The vulnerability's exploitation aligns with ATT&CK technique T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter, as the arbitrary code execution capability enables attackers to run malicious payloads. Additionally, the vulnerability can be classified under T1566 Phishing, since attackers can deliver malicious files through social engineering campaigns targeting users who might open legitimate-looking V7 or V8 files.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2025-47752 should prioritize immediate software updates to versions that address the out-of-bounds write vulnerability, as provided by the vendor. System administrators should implement strict file validation protocols, particularly for files originating from untrusted sources, and consider deploying sandboxing solutions to isolate file processing operations. Network-based mitigations could include filtering for suspicious file extensions and implementing application whitelisting to prevent execution of unapproved software versions. The vulnerability's nature suggests that input sanitization and bounds checking should be enhanced throughout the software's file parsing components, with additional logging mechanisms to detect potential exploitation attempts. Organizations should also consider implementing intrusion detection systems that can identify patterns consistent with exploitation attempts targeting this specific vulnerability, as the memory corruption patterns are detectable through behavioral analysis. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in related software components, as the underlying architecture patterns may be susceptible to similar flaws.