CVE-2025-58014 in Quiz Maker Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 09/22/2025
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through 6.7.0.61.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/22/2025
The CVE-2025-58014 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw within the Ays Pro Quiz Maker plugin, a widely used WordPress quiz management solution. This vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of incoming requests, allowing malicious actors to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. The affected versions span from an unknown starting point through 6.7.0.61, indicating a significant attack surface that could potentially impact numerous WordPress installations. The vulnerability specifically targets the plugin's administrative functionality, where users with sufficient privileges can be tricked into performing unintended operations without their knowledge or consent. The flaw exists in the plugin's handling of HTTP requests, particularly in the processing of administrative actions that modify quiz configurations, user data, or system settings. This type of vulnerability falls under CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in software applications. The vulnerability's classification aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001, which covers phishing with malicious attachments, as attackers could exploit this weakness through crafted web pages designed to trigger unauthorized administrative actions. The impact extends beyond simple data manipulation, as CSRF attacks can lead to complete system compromise when combined with other exploitation techniques. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability to modify quiz parameters, alter user permissions, inject malicious content, or even gain persistent access to the affected WordPress installations. The vulnerability's presence in the administrative interface makes it particularly dangerous, as successful exploitation could allow attackers to manipulate quiz results, modify user accounts, or even establish backdoors within the WordPress environment. The lack of proper anti-CSRF token validation in the plugin's request processing mechanisms creates a direct pathway for malicious actors to bypass authentication controls and execute unauthorized administrative functions.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability demonstrates a fundamental flaw in the plugin's security architecture, where state-changing operations lack proper request origin verification. The affected plugin fails to implement robust CSRF protection measures such as anti-CSRF tokens, referer header validation, or origin checking mechanisms that would normally prevent unauthorized requests from being processed. When an authenticated administrator visits a malicious website containing crafted requests, the plugin processes these requests as legitimate administrative actions without proper verification of the request source or authenticity. This flaw is particularly concerning because the plugin operates within the WordPress admin environment, where users possess elevated privileges that can result in significant damage if exploited. The vulnerability's impact is amplified by the fact that WordPress administrators typically maintain high-privilege access to system configurations, user management, and content modification capabilities. The absence of proper request validation creates a scenario where attackers can craft malicious HTML forms or JavaScript code that automatically submits requests to the vulnerable plugin endpoints. These attacks could be delivered through various vectors including compromised websites, malicious email attachments, or even social engineering campaigns targeting administrators. The vulnerability's scope encompasses all administrative functions within the plugin, meaning that any action that modifies system state could potentially be exploited. The technical nature of this flaw suggests that the plugin's developers may have overlooked standard security practices for handling administrative operations, particularly in the context of web applications that process user-submitted data. The vulnerability's exploitation requires minimal technical expertise, making it accessible to attackers with basic knowledge of web application security concepts. The attack surface is particularly broad given that the vulnerability affects a range of versions, indicating that the security flaw was present for an extended period and likely exploited by threat actors.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2025-58014 should prioritize immediate remediation through plugin updates to versions that address the CSRF vulnerability. Organizations should implement comprehensive security monitoring to detect potential exploitation attempts, including unusual administrative activity patterns or unauthorized configuration changes. The implementation of additional security layers such as web application firewalls can provide defense-in-depth protection against CSRF attacks, particularly when combined with proper input validation and output encoding. Network-level protections including strict referer header validation and origin checking can help prevent unauthorized requests from being processed by the vulnerable plugin. Security professionals should also consider implementing multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts, as this can significantly reduce the impact of successful CSRF exploitation attempts. Regular security audits and penetration testing of WordPress installations can help identify similar vulnerabilities in other plugins or themes that may be present in the same environment. The affected plugin developers should be notified immediately about the vulnerability to ensure proper patching and release of security updates. Organizations should also implement proper access controls and privilege separation, limiting administrative access to only necessary personnel and systems. Security awareness training for administrators can help reduce the risk of social engineering attacks that exploit this vulnerability, particularly when combined with other attack vectors. The implementation of proper logging and monitoring of administrative activities can aid in detecting and responding to potential exploitation attempts, providing crucial forensic data for incident response efforts. Additionally, organizations should consider implementing content security policies and strict browser security controls to limit the potential impact of CSRF attacks through client-side exploitation. The vulnerability's presence underscores the importance of maintaining up-to-date security practices and regular security assessments to identify and remediate similar weaknesses in web applications.