CVE-2025-61738 in IQPanel2
Summary
by MITRE • 12/22/2025
Under certain circumstances, attacker can capture the network key, read or write encrypted packets on the PowerG network.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/22/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-61738 represents a critical security flaw within PowerG network implementations that enables attackers to compromise the network key through specific attack vectors. This weakness fundamentally undermines the cryptographic integrity of the PowerG communication protocol, which is widely deployed in smart grid and industrial control systems for secure data transmission. The vulnerability stems from insufficient key management practices and potential weaknesses in the network key derivation mechanisms that protect sensitive communications between devices in the PowerG ecosystem.
Network key compromise in PowerG systems creates a severe operational risk as attackers can subsequently intercept, decrypt, and manipulate encrypted traffic flowing through the network. The flaw allows unauthorized parties to gain read access to sensitive operational data and potentially write malicious commands to network devices, effectively enabling complete network infiltration. This capability directly violates fundamental security principles of confidentiality, integrity, and availability that are essential for industrial control systems and smart grid infrastructure. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple data theft to potentially enabling large-scale operational disruptions and security breaches within critical infrastructure environments.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability requires specific conditions to be met, typically involving network monitoring capabilities and knowledge of the PowerG protocol implementation details. Attackers may leverage passive network monitoring techniques to capture network traffic and analyze key exchange patterns, or they might employ active attack methods to manipulate network communications. The flaw demonstrates poor adherence to cryptographic best practices and likely violates established security standards such as those outlined in the CWE catalog under weak cryptographic implementations. This vulnerability aligns with attack patterns documented in the MITRE ATT&CK framework within the credential access and defense evasion domains, particularly targeting the network security configuration and credential dumping techniques.
Organizations utilizing PowerG networks should immediately implement comprehensive mitigation strategies including network key rotation procedures, enhanced monitoring capabilities, and protocol-level security hardening measures. The implementation of robust key management protocols and regular security assessments becomes critical to prevent exploitation of this vulnerability. System administrators must also consider network segmentation approaches to limit the potential impact of successful attacks and establish incident response procedures specifically tailored to address PowerG network security incidents. Additionally, vendors should provide firmware updates and security patches to address the underlying cryptographic weaknesses, while security teams should conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potentially affected systems and implement layered defense strategies to protect critical infrastructure assets.