CVE-2025-64232 in Import from YML Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 11/06/2025
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in icopydoc Import from YML import-from-yml allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Import from YML: from n/a through <= 3.1.17.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 01/21/2026
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-64232 represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw within the icopydoc Import from YML plugin, specifically impacting versions ranging from n/a through 3.1.17. This weakness falls under the well-documented category of improper input neutralization during web page generation, creating a persistent security risk that allows malicious actors to inject and execute arbitrary scripts within user browsers. The vulnerability manifests as a reflected XSS attack vector, meaning that malicious input is immediately reflected back to the user's browser without proper sanitization or encoding, making it particularly dangerous for web applications that process user-supplied data. The issue stems from the plugin's failure to adequately sanitize or escape user input before incorporating it into dynamically generated web content, creating an exploitable pathway for attackers to manipulate the application's behavior.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability occurs when the Import from YML plugin processes data from yml files that contain malicious script content. When users interact with the plugin's import functionality, the application fails to properly neutralize special characters and script tags that may be present in the imported content. This flaw creates a direct pathway for attackers to inject javascript code that executes in the context of other users' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, data theft, or further exploitation of the affected system. The reflected nature of this vulnerability means that the malicious payload must be crafted to be included in a URL parameter or form field, which is then reflected back to the user's browser, making it a common vector for phishing attacks and social engineering campaigns. This vulnerability aligns with CWE-79, which specifically addresses cross-site scripting flaws in web applications, and represents a classic example of how insufficient input validation can lead to severe security consequences.
The operational impact of CVE-2025-64232 extends beyond simple script execution, as it can enable attackers to perform a range of malicious activities that compromise user security and application integrity. An attacker could potentially steal user session cookies, redirect users to malicious websites, modify page content, or even execute commands on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability affects any user who interacts with the plugin's import functionality, making it particularly concerning for environments where multiple users may import content from untrusted sources. The reflected nature of the vulnerability means that attackers can craft specific payloads that will execute when unsuspecting users view the affected pages, creating a persistent threat that can be amplified through social engineering techniques. This type of vulnerability is particularly dangerous in enterprise environments where users may have elevated privileges or access to sensitive data, as the XSS attack could potentially escalate to more severe security breaches.
Organizations affected by this vulnerability should implement immediate mitigations to protect their systems and users from potential exploitation. The most effective immediate solution involves updating to the latest version of the Import from YML plugin where the vulnerability has been patched, as this will address the root cause of the input sanitization failure. Additionally, administrators should implement proper input validation and output encoding mechanisms throughout the application, ensuring that all user-supplied data is properly sanitized before being processed or displayed. Implementing content security policies and using proper HTTP headers can further reduce the impact of potential XSS attacks by limiting the execution of unauthorized scripts. Security teams should also consider implementing web application firewalls and monitoring for suspicious input patterns that may indicate attempted exploitation. The vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of maintaining up-to-date software and implementing robust input validation practices, as outlined in the ATT&CK framework's tactics for command and control through web application vulnerabilities. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar weaknesses in other application components, ensuring comprehensive protection against cross-site scripting attacks and related threats that could compromise the entire web application ecosystem.