CVE-2026-101994 in Junos OSinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/15/2026

An Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in the

l2ald

daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker who can control or impersonate a configured MC-LAG ICCP peer to disclose process heap memory or cause a denial of service via a malformed ICCP message.

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/15/2026

The vulnerability identified as Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency within the l2ald daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved represents a critical security flaw in the Layer 2 Advanced LAG Daemon, which is responsible for managing Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation Group (MC-LAG) configurations. This component facilitates communication between peer devices to ensure high availability and load balancing across multiple chassis by maintaining state synchronization through the Inter-Chassis Control Protocol (ICCP). The core technical flaw lies in how the daemon processes incoming ICCP messages, specifically regarding the validation of length parameters associated with message fields. When an attacker who can control or impersonate a configured MC-LAG ICCP peer sends a malformed ICCP message containing inconsistent or maliciously crafted length values, the l2ald daemon fails to properly validate these inputs before processing them. This lack of rigorous bounds checking allows for memory corruption scenarios that manifest either as out-of-bounds reads leading to information disclosure or buffer overflows resulting in application crashes and denial of service conditions.

From a technical perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String or CWE-20: Improper Input Validation, specifically focusing on the failure to validate length parameters against expected buffers or data structures. The attacker exploits the trust relationship inherent in ICCP peer configurations by injecting packets that trigger undefined behavior within the daemon's memory management routines. If the vulnerability results in an out-of-bounds read, sensitive information from the process heap memory, such as internal state variables, cryptographic keys, or other confidential data held by the l2ald process, can be leaked to the attacker. This constitutes a significant confidentiality breach that could facilitate further attacks against the network infrastructure. Conversely, if the malformed input causes a buffer overflow or similar memory corruption issue, it leads directly to a denial of service condition where the daemon crashes and restarts, disrupting MC-LAG operations and potentially causing traffic blackholing or connectivity loss for dependent services relying on this high-availability mechanism.

The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe due to its potential to compromise both confidentiality and availability within enterprise network environments utilizing Juniper hardware. An attacker with access to the management plane or ability to spoof ICCP peers can exploit this flaw without requiring authentication in some configurations, depending on how peer relationships are established. The disclosure of heap memory provides attackers with valuable intelligence about the internal workings of the device, which may include session tokens or routing table details that aid in more sophisticated attacks like privilege escalation or lateral movement within the network segment. Furthermore, the denial of service aspect undermines the primary purpose of MC-LAG deployments, which is to provide seamless failover and redundancy. By causing the l2ald daemon to crash, an attacker can effectively isolate segments of the network from their redundant peers, leading to significant downtime and operational disruption for critical business applications hosted on or traversing these devices.

Mitigation strategies must focus on both immediate remediation and long-term architectural hardening. The primary defense is to apply the vendor-provided software patches that address this specific vulnerability in Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, ensuring all ICCP implementations are updated with proper input validation logic for length parameters. Administrators should also enforce strict access control policies on ICCP peers by using strong authentication mechanisms such as MD5 or SHA-based message digests to prevent unauthorized devices from impersonating legitimate peer nodes. Additionally, network segmentation and firewall rules should be configured to restrict ICCP traffic (typically UDP port 197) to only trusted management networks, thereby limiting the attack surface available to potential adversaries. Regular monitoring of system logs for daemon restarts or anomalies in MC-LAG status can help detect exploitation attempts early. Aligning with MITRE ATT&CK framework techniques, this vulnerability is relevant to T1046: Network Service Discovery if used for reconnaissance via memory leaks, and T1529: System Shutdown or Reboot when exploited for denial of service, emphasizing the need for robust monitoring and incident response procedures tailored to network infrastructure components.

Responsible

Juniper

Reservation

09/28/2026

Disclosure

10/15/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00278

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Want to stay up to date on a daily basis?

Enable the mail alert feature now!