CVE-2026-110084 in Experience Manager
Summary
by MITRE • 10/14/2026
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/14/2026
Adobe Experience Manager is susceptible to an XML injection vulnerability, specifically classified as Blind XPath Injection, which poses a significant risk to the integrity and confidentiality of enterprise content management systems. This flaw resides within the application's processing logic for XML-based inputs, where insufficient sanitization or validation allows malicious actors to inject crafted XPath queries into the backend database operations. The core technical deficiency involves the improper neutralization of special elements used in an XML document, which permits attackers to manipulate how data is queried from underlying storage systems. By exploiting this weakness, a low-privileged attacker can bypass standard authentication and authorization mechanisms that rely on these query structures for access control decisions.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple information disclosure. While the primary classification often highlights unauthorized read access, the specific nature of Blind XPath Injection in Adobe Experience Manager allows for more severe consequences including limited write capabilities. This means an attacker can not only extract sensitive data such as user credentials, configuration files, or proprietary content but also modify existing records within the system. The ability to perform writes significantly escalates the severity from a mere information leak to a potential compromise of system integrity and availability. Attackers can alter administrative settings, inject malicious scripts into published pages, or escalate privileges by modifying role assignments stored in the repository.
From an industry standard perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-643 Improper Mitigation of XPath Injection within the Common Weakness Enumeration framework. The attack vector is characterized as non-interactive and remote, fitting squarely into MITRE ATT&CK technique T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter if used for further exploitation or T1078 Valid Accounts if leveraged to maintain persistent access after initial compromise. Because exploitation does not require user interaction, the risk of automated scanning tools discovering and exploiting this flaw is high. Attackers can systematically probe endpoints using blind techniques that infer data based on response times or error messages rather than direct output display, making detection by standard intrusion prevention systems more challenging without specialized monitoring rules.
Mitigation strategies must address both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements. The primary defense involves applying the latest security patches provided by Adobe to update the affected versions of Experience Manager. These updates typically include code changes that enforce strict input validation and parameterized queries for all XPath operations, ensuring that user-supplied data is treated strictly as literal values rather than executable query logic. Additionally, organizations should implement Web Application Firewalls configured with rulesets specifically designed to detect XPath injection patterns in HTTP requests. Network segmentation can also limit the blast radius by restricting access to critical backend services from untrusted networks. Regular security audits and static code analysis focused on XML processing libraries are essential to identify similar vulnerabilities before they reach production environments, ensuring that future development adheres to secure coding standards such as OWASP guidelines for input validation and output encoding.