CVE-2026-1194 in MineAdmin
Summary
by MITRE • 01/20/2026
A security flaw has been discovered in MineAdmin 1.x/2.x. This affects an unknown function of the component Swagger. The manipulation results in information disclosure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/06/2026
This vulnerability resides within the MineAdmin 1.x/2.x software ecosystem where an undisclosed function within the Swagger component contains a security flaw leading to information disclosure. The flaw exists in the API documentation system that is typically used for developing and testing web applications. When exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to gain access to sensitive information that should remain protected within the system. The attack vector is remotely accessible, meaning that adversaries do not require physical access to the target system or network to exploit this weakness. The fact that a public exploit exists significantly increases the risk profile of this vulnerability as it removes the barrier to entry for potential attackers who may not possess advanced technical skills to develop their own attack methods. The vulnerability represents a critical security gap in the software's architecture where proper access controls or authentication mechanisms have failed to prevent unauthorized information retrieval from the Swagger interface.
The technical nature of this flaw suggests a lack of proper input validation or access control implementation within the Swagger component functions. This could manifest as insufficient authorization checks that allow unauthenticated users to access API endpoints that should only be accessible to authorized personnel. The vulnerability may involve improper handling of API requests where sensitive data structures or endpoint information are exposed without proper security verification. From a cybersecurity perspective, this aligns with common weakness patterns described in CWE-200, which covers improper information disclosure, and CWE-285, which addresses improper authorization within the system. The vulnerability's classification as remote exploitable places it in the ATT&CK framework under the technique T1046 for network service scanning and potentially T1071 for application layer protocols, as attackers would leverage the Swagger interface to probe and extract information from the target system. The absence of vendor response despite early contact indicates a potential lack of support or delayed remediation efforts that leaves users exposed to ongoing threats.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple information disclosure as it can provide attackers with valuable reconnaissance data about the target system's API structure and available endpoints. This intelligence can be leveraged to plan more sophisticated attacks targeting other system components or to identify additional vulnerabilities that may exist within the software stack. The exposure of API documentation and underlying system information can reveal implementation details, version information, and potentially sensitive data structures that could be exploited in subsequent attack phases. Organizations using MineAdmin 1.x/2.x software are particularly at risk since the vulnerability affects core system components that are integral to the software's functionality and security posture. The public availability of exploits means that threat actors can readily deploy automated scanning tools to identify vulnerable systems, dramatically increasing the attack surface and potential for widespread compromise. The lack of vendor response creates an additional operational risk where organizations must rely on their own mitigation efforts without official support or patches from the software vendor.
Organizations should immediately implement defensive measures to protect against exploitation of this vulnerability while awaiting official patches or remediation from the vendor. Network segmentation and access control measures should be strengthened to limit exposure of the Swagger interface to trusted networks and authorized personnel only. Regular monitoring and logging of API access patterns can help detect unauthorized access attempts or unusual information retrieval activities that may indicate exploitation attempts. Security teams should consider disabling or restricting access to the Swagger component until proper patches are applied, particularly in environments where the interface is not essential for legitimate operations. The implementation of web application firewalls and API security controls can provide additional layers of protection against exploitation attempts. Organizations should also conduct comprehensive vulnerability assessments to identify any other potentially affected components within their systems that may share similar architectural weaknesses. The absence of vendor response necessitates proactive security measures including the development of internal mitigation strategies and the consideration of alternative software solutions that provide better vendor support and security response capabilities. Regular security updates and patch management processes should be reinforced to ensure timely deployment of security fixes when they become available.