CVE-2026-120331 in Mailinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 11/03/2026

Content of external URL mails, their stylesheets and images to embed is fetched by the server without validating the target host. Backend users with access to the mail module can make the server send requests to hosts in the internal network.

If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 11/03/2026

The vulnerability described constitutes a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw within an email processing system, specifically affecting backend users who possess administrative or editing privileges for the mail module. This security defect arises from the application's failure to validate the target host when fetching external resources associated with emails. When a user creates or edits an email containing HTML content, the server automatically attempts to retrieve embedded stylesheets and images referenced in that content. Because this retrieval process does not enforce strict allow-listing of domains or IP addresses, the backend system is coerced into initiating HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations specified by the attacker. This lack of input validation on the URL host field allows malicious actors to manipulate the server's behavior beyond its intended scope, effectively turning the application into a proxy for network reconnaissance and internal service exploitation.

From a technical perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-918, which defines Server-Side Request Forgery as a condition where an attacker causes the server-side application to make requests to arbitrary domains or hosts. The operational impact is significant because it bypasses traditional perimeter security controls such as firewalls and network segmentation rules that are designed to protect internal services from external access. By leveraging this flaw, an authenticated backend user can probe the internal network topology, identify running services on private IP ranges, and potentially interact with sensitive internal applications like database management interfaces, administrative dashboards, or cloud metadata endpoints. In environments where these internal services lack robust authentication mechanisms, such as many legacy systems or default configurations of container orchestration platforms, this vulnerability could lead to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within the network infrastructure.

The attack vector is particularly dangerous because it relies on social engineering and legitimate user actions rather than exploiting a direct code execution flaw in the core application logic. An attacker simply needs to craft an email with maliciously formatted HTML that points to internal resources, such as http://192.168.1.5/admin or http://localhost:8080/metadata. When another user views this email or when the system processes it for rendering, the server performs the request in the background. This behavior maps closely to MITRE ATT&CK technique T1557, specifically Adversary-in-the-Middle or Lateral Tool Transfer scenarios where internal systems are used to facilitate further attacks. It also relates to T1046, Network Service Discovery, as the attacker can use response codes and timing differences to enumerate open ports and services on the internal network without directly connecting from their external IP address.

Mitigation strategies must focus on implementing strict output validation and secure coding practices for URL handling within the email module. The most effective defense is to enforce a whitelist of allowed domains or IP ranges that the server is permitted to contact, rejecting any request that does not match these criteria. Additionally, developers should implement network-level controls such as egress filtering at the firewall level to restrict outbound connections from application servers to only those destinations required for business operations. It is also critical to disable automatic fetching of external resources in email clients and web views where possible, or to render content in a sandboxed environment that isolates these requests from the main server process. Regular security audits and static code analysis should be employed to detect similar patterns of unvalidated URL usage across other modules within the application ecosystem.

Responsible

TYPO3

Reservation

11/01/2026

Disclosure

11/03/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00000

KEV

no

Activities

low

Sources

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!