CVE-2026-21083 in Smart Switchinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 08/10/2026

Improper input validation in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.72.6 allows adjacent attackers to access sensitive data.

Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 08/10/2026

This vulnerability represents a critical weakness in the input validation mechanisms of Smart Switch software versions prior to 37726, exposing systems to unauthorized data access by neighboring network entities. The flaw stems from inadequate sanitization and validation of user-supplied inputs, creating an attack vector that allows adjacent attackers to exploit the system's trust model and gain access to sensitive information. Such vulnerabilities typically arise when applications fail to properly validate or sanitize input data before processing it, leading to potential data exposure through various attack vectors including injection techniques and privilege escalation pathways. The security implications extend beyond simple data access, as this weakness can enable attackers to extract confidential information that may include user credentials, system configurations, or proprietary data. The vulnerability's classification aligns with common weakness enumeration cwe 20 which specifically addresses improper input validation issues in software systems. From an operational standpoint, this flaw significantly increases the attack surface for adjacent network entities who can leverage the insufficient validation controls to bypass normal access restrictions and extract sensitive data from the affected system.

The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs through adjacent network access points where attackers can send malformed or malicious inputs to the Smart Switch application. The lack of proper input validation means that crafted payloads can traverse the system's normal processing pathways, potentially leading to information disclosure or unauthorized data access. This type of vulnerability commonly falls under the attack patterns described in the attack tree framework where adjacent network access provides a viable entry point for exploitation, as outlined in the mitre att&ck framework's initial access techniques. The impact extends to various data types that may be stored or processed by the Smart Switch application, including but not limited to user authentication details, system configuration parameters, and potentially sensitive operational data that could compromise overall system security posture.

Organizations utilizing affected Smart Switch versions face significant operational risks as this vulnerability can be exploited without requiring extensive privileges or specialized tools. The adjacent network access requirement means that attackers need only be within the same broadcast domain or network segment to potentially exploit the flaw, making it particularly concerning for environments where physical network proximity is difficult to control or monitor. Security professionals should consider implementing network segmentation strategies to limit adjacent access and reduce the attack surface, while also ensuring that all Smart Switch deployments are updated to version 37726 or later to address this validation weakness. The remediation process involves not only updating the software but also reviewing existing input handling mechanisms to identify similar vulnerabilities across other components of the system architecture, as this represents a systemic issue in data validation approaches that could affect multiple application modules.

The vulnerability demonstrates how fundamental security principles can be compromised through seemingly simple implementation oversights in input validation processes. Organizations should implement comprehensive testing procedures including dynamic and static analysis to identify similar weaknesses in their software applications, while also establishing secure coding practices that emphasize proper input sanitization and validation at every layer of the system architecture. The attack surface reduction strategies should include network monitoring for suspicious adjacent access patterns and regular vulnerability assessments targeting input validation controls, as these types of flaws often remain undetected for extended periods due to their subtle nature and the difficulty in reproducing them within controlled testing environments.

Responsible

SamsungMobile

Reservation

12/11/2025

Disclosure

08/10/2026

Moderation

accepted

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.00000

KEV

no

Activities

low

Sources

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!