CVE-2026-69135 in SuiteCRM
Summary
by MITRE • 11/05/2026
SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the Project module interpolates the authenticated caller's duplicateId POST parameter directly into a SQL query without sanitization, quoting, or parameterization. An authenticated attacker can alter query structure and disclose sensitive database information. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/05/2026
SuiteCRM serves as an open-source enterprise-grade Customer Relationship Management platform widely deployed to manage customer interactions, sales pipelines, and marketing campaigns. Within this application architecture, the Project module handles various data operations related to project tracking and management. A critical security flaw was identified in versions prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2 concerning how the system processes input from authenticated users interacting with the Project module functionality. Specifically, the software fails to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied data before incorporating it into backend database operations, creating a significant vector for exploitation by individuals who have valid credentials within the application environment.
The technical root cause of this vulnerability lies in the improper handling of the duplicateId POST parameter during SQL query construction. When an authenticated user submits a request to create or manage project duplicates, the value provided in the duplicateId field is interpolated directly into a Structured Query Language statement without any form of sanitization, quoting, or parameterized binding. This lack of input validation means that special characters and SQL syntax elements within the input are interpreted as part of the query structure rather than as literal data values. Consequently, an attacker can manipulate the intended logic of the database command by injecting malicious SQL code into this specific field.
This architectural flaw results in a classic Insecure Direct Object Reference combined with SQL Injection characteristics, formally categorized under CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command and CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor. The operational impact is severe for organizations relying on SuiteCRM for sensitive business data. An authenticated attacker can exploit this weakness to alter the structure of database queries, potentially bypassing access controls or extracting confidential information stored within the CRM database. This could include customer personal identifiable information, financial records, strategic project details, and internal communications that are not intended for public disclosure. The ability to modify query structures also opens the door to potential data modification or deletion attacks if the underlying database permissions allow such operations through the application account.
From a threat intelligence perspective, this vulnerability aligns with MITRE ATT&CK techniques related to SQL Injection (T1190) and Data from Information Repositories (T1213). The attack requires authentication, which limits the scope of potential adversaries but increases the severity for insider threats or compromised user accounts. Once authenticated access is obtained, an attacker can leverage this flaw to perform unauthorized data exfiltration with minimal detection risk if logging mechanisms are not strictly monitoring SQL query anomalies.
To mitigate this vulnerability and secure SuiteCRM deployments against exploitation, organizations must immediately upgrade their instances to version 7.15.2 or later for the legacy branch, or version 8.10.2 and later for the modern release track. These versions contain patches that implement proper input validation and utilize parameterized queries to ensure user-supplied data is treated strictly as data rather than executable code. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible due to operational constraints, administrators should enforce strict role-based access controls to limit who can interact with the Project module's duplicate functionality. Additionally, deploying a Web Application Firewall configured with rulesets capable of detecting SQL injection patterns in POST parameters may provide an additional layer of defense by blocking malicious payloads before they reach the application logic. Regular security audits and code reviews focusing on database interaction layers are recommended to prevent similar issues from arising during future development cycles.