CVE-2026-86282 in Tourism-Management-System
Summary
by MITRE • 09/07/2026
A weakness has been identified in jaychouchannel Tourism-Management-System up to 8122bf020d91199eddfff3ee02d1632a70a9a132. Affected is an unknown function of the file travel/src/main/java/com/controller/CommonController.java of the component CommonDao. Executing a manipulation of the argument table/column/xColumn/yColumn can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. This patch is called d44ec3aa0bd2a72c8800e3befb0a9a96a6491b86. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/07/2026
The Jaychouchannel Tourism Management System, specifically prior to commit 8122bf020d91199eddfff3ee02d1632a70a9a132, contains a critical security vulnerability within its CommonDao component. The flaw resides in an unspecified function located in the file travel/src/main/java/com/controller/CommonController.java and is categorized under CWE-89, which denotes Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, commonly known as SQL Injection. This weakness allows an attacker to manipulate database queries by injecting malicious SQL code through specific input parameters. The vulnerability affects multiple arguments including table name, column xColumn, and yColumn, indicating that the application fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied data before incorporating it into dynamic SQL statements.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe due to its remote exploitability. An attacker can launch attacks from a distant location over a network without requiring prior authentication in many configurations, although some variants may require low-privilege access depending on the specific implementation details not fully disclosed here. The ability to manipulate table and column names suggests that the application likely constructs SQL queries using string concatenation or similar unsafe practices rather than prepared statements with parameterized inputs. This lack of input validation enables attackers to bypass authentication controls, extract sensitive data from the database such as user credentials or personal information, modify existing records, or even execute administrative operations on the underlying database server if permissions allow.
The availability of public exploits significantly increases the risk profile for organizations running this version of the software. Since exploit code is already accessible in the wild, automated scanning tools and malicious actors can easily identify vulnerable instances and launch attacks with minimal effort. The absence of a formal versioning scheme complicates vulnerability management efforts because administrators cannot rely on semantic version numbers to determine patch applicability. Instead, remediation must be based on commit hashes or specific build identifiers, requiring careful verification that the applied fix corresponds exactly to the recommended patch d44ec3aa0bd2a72c8800e3befb0a9a96a6491b86.
From a defensive perspective, this vulnerability aligns with MITRE ATT&CK technique T1190, which covers Exploitation of Application Programming Interfaces (API), as the attack vector likely involves interacting with exposed endpoints or functions within the CommonController. To mitigate this issue, immediate application of patch d44ec3aa0bd2a72c8800e3befb0a9a96a6491b86 is required for all affected systems. Beyond applying the patch, developers should refactor the CommonDao component to use parameterized queries or stored procedures exclusively when interacting with the database. Input validation must be implemented at both the controller and service layers to ensure that table names and column identifiers are validated against a whitelist of allowed values rather than being accepted directly from user input. Additionally, deploying a Web Application Firewall can provide an additional layer of defense by filtering out malicious SQL patterns in HTTP requests before they reach the application logic.