CVE-2026-88186 in Officeinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/14/2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/14/2026

The vulnerability described constitutes a critical security flaw within the Microsoft Office Word application, specifically manifesting as a heap-based buffer overflow condition. This type of memory corruption error occurs when a program writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer located in the heap segment of computer memory. In the context of Microsoft Office Word, this defect is typically triggered by processing specially crafted documents or files that exploit parsing logic errors within the application's rendering engine or object handling routines. The attacker crafts input data designed to exceed the expected size limits of internal buffers used for storing document elements such as text, images, or embedded objects. When Word attempts to process these malformed inputs, it fails to perform adequate bounds checking, resulting in adjacent memory being overwritten with malicious code or shellcode. This overwriting corrupts critical control structures within the heap, allowing an attacker to redirect program execution flow and achieve arbitrary code execution on the affected system.

From a technical perspective, this vulnerability aligns closely with Common Weakness Enumeration identifier CWE-120, which classifies buffer copy without checking size limits as a fundamental memory safety issue. The exploitation of such flaws often involves precise manipulation of heap metadata to gain control over function pointers or return addresses stored in the overwritten memory regions. Because Microsoft Office applications are widely deployed across enterprise and personal environments, this vulnerability presents a significant attack surface. An unauthorized attacker can leverage this flaw by distributing malicious documents through various vectors including email attachments, shared network drives, or compromised websites hosting downloadable files. The ability to execute code over a network implies that remote exploitation is feasible without requiring prior authentication on the target system, provided the user opens the crafted document within Word.

The operational impact of successfully exploiting this vulnerability is severe and comprehensive. Once an attacker achieves arbitrary code execution via heap corruption, they can run programs with the same privileges as the current user. This capability allows for full compromise of the affected workstation or server, enabling actions such as installing malware, stealing sensitive data, creating new accounts for persistent access, or using the compromised machine as a pivot point to attack other systems within the internal network. The risk is exacerbated by the fact that many organizations rely on Microsoft Office for critical business operations, making them attractive targets for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors alike. Furthermore, because the vulnerability exists in a commonly used productivity suite, automated exploitation tools can be developed quickly, leading to widespread infections if patches are not applied promptly.

To mitigate this risk, immediate action is required from system administrators and end-users. The primary defense is applying the latest security updates released by Microsoft for all versions of Office Word affected by this vulnerability. Organizations should prioritize patching efforts based on asset criticality and exposure levels. In addition to software updates, implementing application control policies can restrict the execution of untrusted scripts or macros within documents, thereby reducing the attack surface even if a buffer overflow is triggered. Users must be educated about social engineering tactics often used to deliver malicious files, such as phishing emails containing deceptive attachments. Network segmentation and endpoint detection and response solutions should also be utilized to monitor for anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts, providing an additional layer of defense in depth against this class of memory corruption vulnerabilities.

Responsible

Microsoft

Reservation

09/09/2026

Disclosure

10/14/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00000

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!