CVE-2004-2567 in ReciPants
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in ReciPants 1.1.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) user id, (2) recipe id, (3) category id, and (4) other ID number fields.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/29/2018
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2004-2567 represents a critical SQL injection flaw affecting ReciPants version 1.1.1, a web-based recipe management application. This vulnerability exposes multiple entry points within the application's input validation mechanisms, creating pathways for remote attackers to manipulate the underlying database infrastructure. The flaw specifically impacts four distinct identifier fields including user id, recipe id, category id, and other numeric ID number fields, all of which are processed without adequate sanitization or parameterization. The vulnerability falls under CWE-89 which classifies SQL injection as a weakness where untrusted data is directly incorporated into SQL commands without proper validation or escaping mechanisms. This particular vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1190 which describes the exploitation of vulnerabilities in web applications to execute arbitrary code and gain unauthorized access to backend systems.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from the application's failure to properly validate and sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into database queries. When users provide values through the affected ID fields, the application constructs SQL statements by directly concatenating these inputs without employing parameterized queries or proper input sanitization techniques. This allows attackers to inject malicious SQL code that gets executed by the database engine, potentially enabling full database compromise. The vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it affects multiple data points within the application's core functionality, providing attackers with numerous opportunities to exploit the weakness. Each of the four identified fields represents a separate attack vector that could be leveraged to escalate privileges, extract sensitive information, or modify database records.
The operational impact of CVE-2004-2567 extends beyond simple data theft, as successful exploitation could result in complete system compromise and unauthorized access to sensitive user information. Attackers could potentially access user accounts, recipe data, category information, and any other data stored within the database system. The vulnerability enables attackers to perform actions such as user account enumeration, data modification, unauthorized data access, and even database schema reconnaissance. In a real-world scenario, this could lead to exposure of personal information, recipe collections, user credentials, and potentially allow attackers to establish persistent access to the application infrastructure. The impact is amplified by the fact that the vulnerability affects core application functionality, meaning that even basic navigation and interaction with the system could be exploited by malicious actors.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability must focus on implementing proper input validation and parameterized query execution throughout the application. The most effective approach involves replacing direct string concatenation with parameterized SQL queries that separate user input from SQL command structure. Organizations should implement comprehensive input sanitization routines that validate all numeric inputs against expected ranges and formats. Additionally, the application should employ proper error handling that does not expose database structure information to end users. Security measures should include regular code reviews focusing on database interaction patterns, implementation of web application firewalls to detect suspicious SQL patterns, and adherence to secure coding practices as outlined in OWASP Top Ten. The vulnerability also underscores the importance of keeping applications updated and patched, as this issue was likely addressed in subsequent versions of ReciPants through proper input validation implementation.