CVE-2006-0271 in Database Server
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade & Downgrade component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB28. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that the problem is SQL injection in the DBMS_REGISTRY package in certain parameters to the (1) IS_COMPONENT, (2) GET_COMP_OPTION, (3) DISABLE_DDL_TRIGGERS, (4) SCRIPT_EXISTS, (5) COMP_PATH, (6) GATHER_STATS, (7) NOTHING_SCRIPT, and (8) VALIDATE_COMPONENTS functions.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/23/2024
The vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0271 represents a critical security flaw within Oracle Database server versions 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4, specifically within the Upgrade & Downgrade component. This issue manifests as an unspecified vulnerability that has been catalogued under Oracle vulnerability number DB28, indicating the severity and importance of the flaw within Oracle's security framework. The vulnerability's nature is particularly concerning because it involves SQL injection attacks that can compromise the integrity and confidentiality of database operations.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability occurs within the DBMS_REGISTRY package, which serves as a critical component for managing database registry information during upgrade and downgrade operations. The flaw specifically affects eight distinct functions within this package: IS_COMPONENT, GET_COMP_OPTION, DISABLE_DDL_TRIGGERS, SCRIPT_EXISTS, COMP_PATH, GATHER_STATS, NOTHING_SCRIPT, and VALIDATE_COMPONENTS. These functions handle various aspects of component management and registry validation during database operations, making them prime targets for exploitation. The vulnerability arises from insufficient input validation and sanitization of parameters passed to these functions, allowing malicious actors to inject SQL commands that can be executed within the database context.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe and multifaceted, as it provides attackers with potential access to execute arbitrary SQL commands within the database environment. This capability can lead to unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion, potentially compromising the entire database system. The attack vectors are particularly dangerous because they can be exploited during routine upgrade and downgrade operations when database administrators are already interacting with the system. The vulnerability's presence in multiple versions of Oracle Database indicates a widespread exposure that affects organizations using these legacy systems. According to CWE standards, this vulnerability maps to CWE-89 SQL Injection, which is classified as a high-risk weakness that can result in complete system compromise when exploited properly.
The security implications extend beyond simple data manipulation, as successful exploitation can enable attackers to escalate privileges, bypass authentication mechanisms, and potentially gain access to underlying operating system resources. This type of vulnerability is particularly concerning in enterprise environments where Oracle databases often contain sensitive corporate data, financial records, and personal information. The attack surface is widened by the fact that these functions are typically called during administrative operations, making the exploitation more likely to occur in legitimate database management scenarios. Organizations implementing the ATT&CK framework would classify this vulnerability under the T1078 Valid Accounts and T1046 Network Service Scanning tactics, as exploitation requires valid database access and can lead to further reconnaissance activities. The lack of detailed information from Oracle initially created uncertainty, but independent researcher verification confirmed the SQL injection nature of the vulnerability, highlighting the importance of third-party security validation in identifying and addressing database security flaws. Mitigation strategies should focus on immediate patching of affected systems, implementation of proper input validation procedures, and enhanced monitoring of database registry operations during upgrade and downgrade activities to detect potential exploitation attempts.