CVE-2006-0841 in Mantis
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Mantis 1.00rc4 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) hide_status, (2) handler_id, (3) user_monitor, (4) reporter_id, (5) view_type, (6) show_severity, (7) show_category, (8) show_status, (9) show_resolution, (10) show_build, (11) show_profile, (12) show_priority, (13) highlight_changed, (14) relationship_type, and (15) relationship_bug parameters in (a) view_all_set.php; the (16) sort parameter in (b) manage_user_page.php; the (17) view_type parameter in (c) view_filters_page.php; and the (18) title parameter in (d) proj_doc_delete.php. NOTE: item 17 might be subsumed by CVE-2005-4522.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/08/2021
The vulnerability described in CVE-2006-0841 represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw affecting Mantis version 1.00rc4 and earlier. This vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation and output sanitization within the web application's parameter handling mechanisms. The flaw exists across multiple PHP script files including view_all_set.php, manage_user_page.php, view_filters_page.php, and proj_doc_delete.php, making it particularly widespread and dangerous. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-79 as "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')", which is a fundamental weakness in web application security that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users.
Multiple parameters across different files present attack vectors for this XSS vulnerability, with the most significant being the hide_status, handler_id, user_monitor, reporter_id, and view_type parameters in view_all_set.php. The sort parameter in manage_user_page.php and view_type in view_filters_page.php also provide opportunities for exploitation. Additionally, the title parameter in proj_doc_delete.php represents another potential entry point for malicious script injection. These parameters are processed without proper sanitization of user-supplied input, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the context of other users' browsers. The vulnerability's impact is amplified by the fact that these parameters are typically used in URL query strings, making exploitation straightforward through crafted web requests.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe as it enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in victims' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or redirection to malicious sites. Attackers could exploit these vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to user accounts, modify application data, or perform actions on behalf of legitimate users. The vulnerability affects the core functionality of the Mantis bug tracking system, potentially compromising the integrity and confidentiality of bug reports, user information, and project data. This type of vulnerability directly aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001 for "Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment" and T1566.002 for "Phishing: Spearphishing Link" when used in targeted attacks against users of the affected system.
Mitigation strategies should focus on implementing proper input validation and output encoding across all user-supplied parameters. The recommended approach involves sanitizing all input data before processing and ensuring that all output is properly escaped according to the context in which it is rendered. This includes implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit script execution and employing proper HTML encoding for all dynamic content. The vulnerability should be addressed through immediate patching of the Mantis application to version 1.00rc5 or later, which contains the necessary fixes for these XSS vulnerabilities. Additionally, organizations should implement web application firewalls and conduct regular security assessments to identify similar vulnerabilities in their web applications. The remediation process should also include comprehensive security training for developers on secure coding practices to prevent similar issues in future application development cycles.