CVE-2006-1404 in BlankOL
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in bol.cgi in BlankOL 1.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) file or (2) function parameter.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/19/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2006-1404 affects the BlankOL 1.0 content management system and its associated bol.cgi script, representing a critical cross-site scripting weakness that exposes web applications to malicious code injection attacks. This vulnerability resides within the parameter handling mechanisms of the bol.cgi script, specifically targeting the file and function parameters which are processed without adequate input validation or output sanitization. The flaw enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML code within the context of affected web applications, potentially compromising user sessions and data integrity. Such vulnerabilities fall under the CWE-79 category of Cross-Site Scripting, which is classified as a fundamental web application security weakness that has been consistently documented in security frameworks and standards.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input parameters within the bol.cgi script. When attackers provide malicious payloads through the file or function parameters, the script processes these inputs directly without proper encoding or validation mechanisms. This processing allows attackers to inject script code that executes in the victim's browser context, creating a persistent threat vector that can be exploited across multiple user sessions. The vulnerability operates at the application layer and can be leveraged through various attack vectors including malicious links, infected web pages, or social engineering techniques that prompt users to interact with compromised content. The security implications extend beyond simple script execution to include potential session hijacking, data theft, and further exploitation of the compromised application environment.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is significant for organizations utilizing BlankOL 1.0 systems, as it provides attackers with a direct pathway to compromise user browsers and potentially escalate privileges within the application context. Users who interact with maliciously crafted URLs containing the vulnerable parameters may unknowingly execute attacker-controlled code, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information, session manipulation, and potential system compromise. The vulnerability affects not only individual user experiences but also the overall security posture of web applications that rely on the affected software components. Attackers can leverage this weakness to create persistent backdoors, harvest cookies and session tokens, or redirect users to malicious sites, thereby establishing a foothold for more sophisticated attacks within the network infrastructure. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566 which covers spearphishing with a link, demonstrating how such XSS flaws can be weaponized through social engineering campaigns.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2006-1404 should prioritize immediate remediation through software updates and patches provided by the vendor, as the vulnerability represents an outdated security flaw that has been addressed in subsequent releases. Organizations must implement comprehensive input validation mechanisms that sanitize all user-supplied data before processing, particularly focusing on the specific file and function parameters mentioned in the vulnerability description. Web application firewalls and security headers should be configured to detect and prevent XSS attacks, while developers should adopt secure coding practices that include output encoding and context-aware sanitization techniques. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities within the application codebase, with particular attention to parameter handling and user input processing. Additionally, implementing content security policies and disabling unnecessary script execution capabilities can significantly reduce the attack surface and limit the potential impact of such vulnerabilities. The remediation process should also include user education and awareness programs to help identify suspicious links and prevent inadvertent interaction with malicious content.