CVE-2006-2053 in QuickEStore
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in QuickEStore 7.9 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the OrderID parameter in (a) shipping.cfm and (b) checkout.cfm, (2) ItemID parameter in (c) proddetail.cfm, (3) SubCatID parameter in (d) index.cfm, the (4) CategoryID parameter in (e) prodpage.cfm, and (5) ProdID parameter in (f) Details.cfm. NOTE: these issues can also be exploited for path disclosure.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/25/2018
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2006-2053 represents a critical SQL injection flaw affecting QuickEStore version 7.9 and earlier, demonstrating a fundamental failure in input validation and parameter handling within web applications. This vulnerability resides in multiple file components of the e-commerce platform, specifically targeting parameters used for retrieving and displaying product information, order processing, and category navigation. The flaw allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands directly into the application's database queries through several entry points, creating a pathway for unauthorized data access, manipulation, and potential system compromise.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of user-supplied input parameters within the application's backend database interactions. When attackers supply malicious input through parameters such as OrderID in shipping.cfm and checkout.cfm, ItemID in proddetail.cfm, SubCatID in index.cfm, CategoryID in prodpage.cfm, or ProdID in Details.cfm, the application fails to properly escape or validate these inputs before incorporating them into SQL query strings. This creates an environment where attacker-controlled data can alter the intended execution flow of database commands, potentially allowing full database access and arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-89, which specifically addresses SQL injection flaws in software applications, and demonstrates the classic pattern of insufficient input validation leading to database command injection.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft to encompass complete system compromise and unauthorized administrative access. Attackers can leverage the SQL injection to extract sensitive customer information including personal details, credit card data, and order histories, while also potentially gaining access to administrative functions through database privilege escalation. The path disclosure aspect of this vulnerability further amplifies the risk by potentially exposing sensitive file paths and system information that could aid in subsequent attacks. According to ATT&CK framework, this vulnerability maps to T1190 - Exploit Public-Facing Application, where attackers can exploit vulnerable web applications to gain unauthorized access to backend systems. The widespread nature of the affected parameters across multiple application modules increases the attack surface significantly, making it easier for threat actors to identify successful exploitation vectors.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing robust input validation, parameterized queries, and proper database access controls. The most effective immediate solution involves updating to a patched version of QuickEStore, as the vulnerability affects multiple components that require coordinated fixes. Additionally, implementing proper input sanitization routines that filter or escape special characters in all user-supplied parameters will prevent malicious SQL code from being executed. Database access should be restricted to minimal required privileges, and all database interactions should utilize parameterized queries or stored procedures to prevent injection attacks. Organizations should also implement web application firewalls and intrusion detection systems to monitor for suspicious SQL injection patterns. The remediation process should include comprehensive security testing of all application components, particularly those handling user input, and regular security audits to identify similar vulnerabilities in other applications. Proper error handling should be implemented to prevent information leakage through database error messages that could aid attackers in crafting successful injection payloads.