CVE-2006-3279 in aeDating
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in aeDating 4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Sex parameter in index.php, (2) ProfileType parameter in join_form.php, and (3) Email parameter in forgot.php.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/30/2018
The CVE-2006-3279 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw in aeDating 4.1, a web-based dating platform that was prevalent during the mid-2000s era of online dating services. This vulnerability falls under the CWE-79 category of Cross-Site Scripting, which is one of the most common and dangerous web application security flaws. The vulnerability specifically affects three distinct input parameters across different pages of the application, demonstrating a widespread failure in input validation and output sanitization mechanisms. The affected parameters include the Sex parameter in index.php, ProfileType parameter in join_form.php, and Email parameter in forgot.php, indicating that the application's security measures were not consistently applied across all user input points. This particular vulnerability represents a classic example of how web applications can be exploited when they fail to properly validate and sanitize user-supplied data before incorporating it into dynamic web content.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs when remote attackers craft malicious input strings containing script code or HTML tags and submit them through the identified parameters. When the application processes these inputs without proper sanitization, the malicious code gets embedded into the web page responses and executed in the browsers of unsuspecting users who visit the affected pages. The attack vector operates through the standard XSS mechanism where user input flows directly into HTML output without appropriate encoding or filtering, creating a persistent security risk that can be leveraged for various malicious activities including session hijacking, credential theft, and redirection to malicious websites. This vulnerability specifically demonstrates a failure in the application's data validation pipeline, where the software does not adequately distinguish between legitimate user input and potentially harmful script code. The impact is particularly severe given that the vulnerable parameters are part of core user registration and account recovery workflows, meaning that attackers could potentially compromise user accounts during the most critical phases of user interaction with the dating platform.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple code execution, as it can be leveraged to create sophisticated attacks that compromise user privacy and system integrity. Attackers could potentially inject scripts that steal session cookies, redirect users to phishing sites, or even modify the application's behavior to display malicious content. The fact that the vulnerability affects parameters used in user registration and account recovery processes creates a particularly dangerous attack surface, as these are often the most trusted interactions users have with the application. The vulnerability's persistence across multiple pages of the application indicates a systemic security flaw in the codebase's architecture, suggesting that the developers failed to implement consistent security measures throughout the application's functionality. This vulnerability also aligns with the ATT&CK framework's T1059.001 technique for command and scripting interpreter, as attackers can leverage the XSS to execute arbitrary code within the victim's browser context. The implications for the dating platform's users are severe, as personal information, relationships, and potentially sensitive communications could be compromised through this vulnerability, making it a critical security concern that required immediate remediation.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability must address the fundamental security weaknesses in the application's input handling mechanisms. The most effective approach involves implementing comprehensive input validation and output encoding across all user-facing parameters, ensuring that any user-supplied data is properly sanitized before being processed or displayed. The application should employ proper HTML entity encoding for all dynamic content, particularly when rendering user inputs in web pages. Additionally, the implementation of Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can provide an additional layer of protection against script injection attacks, even if other security measures fail. Regular security code reviews and input validation testing should be implemented to prevent similar vulnerabilities from emerging in future versions of the application. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of following secure coding practices as outlined in industry standards such as the OWASP Top Ten and the CERT Secure Coding Standards, which emphasize the need for consistent security controls throughout the application lifecycle. Organizations should also consider implementing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) to provide additional protection against known XSS attack patterns while the underlying code vulnerabilities are being addressed. The remediation process should include thorough testing to ensure that all input parameters are properly validated and that the application's response to malicious inputs is appropriately handled without compromising functionality.