CVE-2006-3434 in Officeinfo

Summary

by MITRE

Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2000, XP, 2003, 2004 for Mac, and v.X for Mac allows remote user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string that triggers memory corruption.

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 04/24/2026

This vulnerability represents a critical memory corruption flaw affecting multiple versions of Microsoft Office across different platforms including Office 2000, XP, 2003, 2004 for Mac, and v.X for Mac. The unspecified nature of the vulnerability indicates that the exact technical mechanism remains undisclosed, though the classification suggests it involves improper memory handling that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Such vulnerabilities typically arise from insufficient input validation or buffer overflow conditions where maliciously crafted data can overwrite memory segments, potentially allowing attackers to execute malicious code with the privileges of the affected application. The remote user-assisted nature implies that attackers can exploit this vulnerability through network-based delivery methods, requiring user interaction to trigger the malicious payload, which aligns with common attack patterns where social engineering plays a role in successful exploitation.

The technical implications of this vulnerability extend beyond simple code execution to encompass potential privilege escalation and system compromise scenarios. Memory corruption vulnerabilities of this nature often fall under CWE-121, which describes stack-based buffer overflow conditions, or CWE-122, which covers heap-based buffer overflows, though the exact classification would depend on the specific implementation flaw. The attack vector suggests that the vulnerability can be triggered through malformed input strings that are processed by Microsoft Office applications, potentially during document parsing or text rendering operations. This type of vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it can be exploited through various attack surfaces including email attachments, web downloads, or file sharing scenarios where users might inadvertently open maliciously crafted Office documents.

The operational impact of this vulnerability spans across enterprise and individual user environments where Microsoft Office remains the primary productivity suite. Organizations that have not updated their Office installations to patched versions face significant risk of unauthorized system access, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within network environments. The widespread adoption of these Office versions across different platforms makes this vulnerability particularly attractive to attackers seeking broad exploitation capabilities. From an ATT&CK framework perspective, this vulnerability would map to techniques involving execution through compromised applications, potentially leveraging T1059 for command execution and T1078 for persistence mechanisms. The user-assisted nature requires that attackers typically employ social engineering tactics to convince victims to open malicious documents, making this vulnerability particularly effective in targeted phishing campaigns or supply chain attacks.

Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on immediate patch management and application hardening measures. Microsoft would have released security updates addressing this specific memory corruption flaw, and organizations should prioritize deployment of these patches across all affected Office installations. Additional defensive measures include implementing email filtering solutions to detect and block suspicious Office documents, enabling macro security settings to prevent automatic execution of potentially malicious code, and establishing user awareness training programs to reduce the success rate of social engineering attacks. Network-based protections such as application whitelisting, sandboxing of Office applications, and regular security assessments can provide additional layers of defense. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of maintaining up-to-date security patches across all software platforms, as outdated applications continue to represent significant attack vectors in modern cybersecurity environments. Organizations should also consider implementing endpoint detection and response solutions to identify potential exploitation attempts and monitor for unusual memory access patterns that might indicate exploitation of similar vulnerabilities.

Reservation

07/07/2006

Disclosure

10/10/2006

Moderation

accepted

Entry

VDB-2594

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.29568

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!